The logic is actually not flawed. Rankings in general are a flawed exercise, especially early in the season. Some combination of power rankings based on how good a team is expected to be going forward and their past resume.
But you can't rank teams based soley on head to head results.
Bama has a big win over Georgia and a loss to Vanderbilt
Georgia has a big win over Clemson and a loss to Bama.
The wins are better for Bama but the loss is worse. Both factor in.
I am curious to see how those two are ranked by KFords Most Deserving Rankings tomorrow. An attempt at an objective approach to ranking teams based on the on field results.