Daniel Seahorn
On the 40
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2015
- Messages
- 8,458
Damn, Juan.We will show up for a free food buffet
But not a 2-9 Kansas team
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.
SignUp Now!Damn, Juan.We will show up for a free food buffet
But not a 2-9 Kansas team
Hate to correct such a good post, but it was 1-9 until they didn't show up..We will show up for a free food buffet
But not a 2-9 Kansas team
At this point, everything is possible from it being a clown show to everything is under control.I finally caught up reading every post and no one has mentioned this: is it possible that perhaps certain BMD's (in the anti-Strong group) leaked information to the media of Charlie Strong's firing in an effort to put pressure on the ones in charge of making that call to, in fact, pull the trigger?
I was right there with you Dbut. Here was my post in the press conference thread:I finally caught up reading every post and no one has mentioned this: is it possible that perhaps certain BMD's (in the anti-Strong group) leaked information to the media of Charlie Strong's firing in an effort to put pressure on the ones in charge of making that call to, in fact, pull the trigger?
Good stuff Embrey! I hadn't made it to the press conference thread before I posted this...I was right there with you Dbut. Here was my post in the press conference thread:
I believe it was donors, acting as 'unnamed sources' who were the genesis of the 'Charlie has been fired' articles. It makes zero sense that the admin would leak their decision. If what you say is true, they are stupider than I thought.
We think alikeGood stuff Embrey! I hadn't made it to the press conference thread before I posted this...
Which is kinda what we should all probably do. In my opinion, I totally wouldn't rule out Strong returning next year considering the s#!t show we're in the process of witnessing.That's why Mike didn't post anything further on this situation until if anything was official
This^I finally caught up reading every post and no one has mentioned this: is it possible that perhaps certain BMD's (in the anti-Strong group) leaked information to the media of Charlie Strong's firing in an effort to put pressure on the ones in charge of making that call to, in fact, pull the trigger?
BOR members or member is the problem, BMD's don't have as much run that folks like to believe they have. They can damn sure muddy up the water, but that's about it.I finally caught up reading every post and no one has mentioned this: is it possible that perhaps certain BMD's (in the anti-Strong group) leaked information to the media of Charlie Strong's firing in an effort to put pressure on the ones in charge of making that call to, in fact, pull the trigger?
Certainly it is possible. Just as it is possible that certain people within the administration, with an agenda, have leaked information. Bottom line, information leaks can come from anywhere. There are lots of people with an agenda on both sides of the coin.I finally caught up reading every post and no one has mentioned this: is it possible that perhaps certain BMD's (in the anti-Strong group) leaked information to the media of Charlie Strong's firing in an effort to put pressure on the ones in charge of making that call to, in fact, pull the trigger?