63_Texas_1
Rookie
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2013
- Messages
- 1,720
I have read the debate between Randolph Duke and others with great interest. I see merit in both point of views. To me, if CDC is the fund raiser that everyone claims he is, there is another choice. Keep in mind that football is the front porch to The University. CDC leverages the point to BMDs that if you are really interested in UT athletics, The University and willing to buy out TH and pay UM what he wants (which is a lot of money), then let's show the UT family and the world they are interested in more than football, i.e.; pitch in a little more to bring back employees who were laid off. Then sell that football is not the main criteria at The University of Texas (like it is attempted at aggy land), but SUCCESS on and off the field for UT athletics and their individuals. This is a win/win and a PR win.
PS - My only issue with UM is the baggage that UM brings could cancel the perception of trying to do the right thing for UT. Does UT want the chance of some of his repeat behavior that could tarnish the school's reputation for the sake of winning. That has a smell of SEC. Then again, he may be the only coach who can right the ship.
PS - My only issue with UM is the baggage that UM brings could cancel the perception of trying to do the right thing for UT. Does UT want the chance of some of his repeat behavior that could tarnish the school's reputation for the sake of winning. That has a smell of SEC. Then again, he may be the only coach who can right the ship.
Last edited by a moderator: