texbound
Under Contract
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2013
- Messages
- 5,329
True, but I sure as hell would try my hardest.
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.
SignUp Now!True, but I sure as hell would try my hardest.
Help me follow the logic if you're a UT staff member.Cam was not why Sexton was turned away.
I think you do your due diligence on a plethora of targets that you will never take.Help me follow the logic if you're a UT staff member.
Why turn away your second RT target if your first RT isn't going to commit to you?
Now, you're back to the drawing board completely after months of work.
Is this a good or bad thing for Texas? SHA or Tfloss, any thoughts?Banks has moved up his commitment to July 4th
Of course, but you rarely bring in official visitors if they aren't a realistic target.I think you do your due diligence on a plethora of targets that you will never take.
Why assume that Sexton was the second target or that Cam was the first? I can't answer your question because I do not agree with the premise.
https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia1.tenor.com%2Fimages%2Fc2c19e7c94777a98da97b475d6537254%2Ftenor.gif%3Fitemid%3D16144278&f=1&nofb=1Is this a good or bad thing for Texas? SHA or Tfloss, any thoughts?
I would find it hard to believe that a 3-star with a weight issue was our #1 target.Of course, but you rarely bring in official visitors if they aren't a realistic target.
Hamilton from IT said it's 100% true the staff turned Sexton down because they anticipated grabbing Williams.
You seem to believe they all of sudden decided Sexton wasn't a take at all?
My first instinct is it's not good news, but hopefully the staff asked Banks to move up his timeline.Is this a good or bad thing for Texas? SHA or Tfloss, any thoughts?
If I agreed with you on that, that still doesn't explain why you toss Sexton to the side.I would find it hard to believe that a 3-star with a weight issue was our #1 target.
Here is hoping the the staff did that. Either way, we will have a clearer picture of the Oline recruiting come Sunday. They will either have 3, 2, 1 or none of their targets.My first instinct is it's not good news, but hopefully the staff asked Banks to move up his timeline.
Remember, Cam was a late offer, so him being #1 would be a stretch, at best.If I agreed with you on that, that still doesn't explain why you toss Sexton to the side.
Who's the #1 RT target then?
That's a good question. Maybe Agbo is #1 (I just threw a name out there). Who knows.If I agreed with you on that, that still doesn't explain why you toss Sexton to the side.
Who's the #1 RT target then?
I was mainly curious why you definitively said Williams wasn't the reason we turned Sexton away, which implied there's something else going that hasn't been discussed publicly.Remember, Cam was a late offer, so him being #1 would be a stretch, at best.
I hate to speculate, but perhaps they saw something in the Sexton recruitment that they didn't like. Has OU been knocking over tables to get to him? Why were we having such an easy time with him?
Having a bad feeling on this one. Guess we'll see in two days. Be interested to see who IT's source is. I've always thought it may be the dad or his HC that's an ex Longhorn.Banks has been a big Texas lean for months.
Lots of Oregon buzz right now for sure.Having a bad feeling on this one. Guess we'll see in two days. Be interested to see who IT's source is. I've always thought it may be the dad or his HC that's an ex Longhorn.