orangeflow
Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2013
- Messages
- 198
This was posted by Mahico and I thought it had some merit after reading it...
Ignore screw it, i'll be the bad guy: The problem with Watson Reply
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is that he would be a very hard sell to Texas high School offensive recruits over Briles, Patterson, Sumlin, Gundy, Stoops or even Kliff Kingsberry. VERY hard sell. There's nothing exciting about his offenses. He has no Texas ties at all. None. There is literally nothing about the guy's resume that qualities him for this hire. It was his offense at Nebraska that kept them from winning something significant. He basically backed into that position at UL when Sanford couldn't get anything going.
This could potentially end up being a total disaster hire for a head coach needing to get this right. As far as Watson's abilities, i think he's an average coordinator. What I don't like about him is that he's too multiple. He's up tempto and then he's not. He's under center and then he's not. You don't see the top coordinators do this. They have a theory about what they want to do and they do it. How many times do you see OU in a bunch formation? Or not run their uptempo offense especially early? They don't because they know what they want to do and they go do it. Sound familiar? It should, because this is what's been the problem with Texas over the past 3 years. No offensive flow. No excitement. No identity on offense.
UL scored 20 points against Houston and 24 against Memphis. This with a Heisman level QB under center. His offenses are the definition of boring and conservative.
I say this as a fan. Not as someone who expects Watson to be the guy. But the Texas QB situation is a mess right now and we need a top notch guy to come in and get these young guys ready to play. But as far as recruiting goes, it's hard to imagine top recruits on offense coming to play for Watson.
Ignore screw it, i'll be the bad guy: The problem with Watson Reply
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is that he would be a very hard sell to Texas high School offensive recruits over Briles, Patterson, Sumlin, Gundy, Stoops or even Kliff Kingsberry. VERY hard sell. There's nothing exciting about his offenses. He has no Texas ties at all. None. There is literally nothing about the guy's resume that qualities him for this hire. It was his offense at Nebraska that kept them from winning something significant. He basically backed into that position at UL when Sanford couldn't get anything going.
This could potentially end up being a total disaster hire for a head coach needing to get this right. As far as Watson's abilities, i think he's an average coordinator. What I don't like about him is that he's too multiple. He's up tempto and then he's not. He's under center and then he's not. You don't see the top coordinators do this. They have a theory about what they want to do and they do it. How many times do you see OU in a bunch formation? Or not run their uptempo offense especially early? They don't because they know what they want to do and they go do it. Sound familiar? It should, because this is what's been the problem with Texas over the past 3 years. No offensive flow. No excitement. No identity on offense.
UL scored 20 points against Houston and 24 against Memphis. This with a Heisman level QB under center. His offenses are the definition of boring and conservative.
I say this as a fan. Not as someone who expects Watson to be the guy. But the Texas QB situation is a mess right now and we need a top notch guy to come in and get these young guys ready to play. But as far as recruiting goes, it's hard to imagine top recruits on offense coming to play for Watson.