Nice writeup Cheese.
Agree that our D looks real bad....I won't compare to the Diaz fiasco, because hopefull that was a once in a lifetime occurance, like a 500 year hurricane.
But I do think it is valid to compare to the Reese years, based no missed tackles.
We also are as you said completely vulnerable to the the straight dive gash. Blows the mind, huge holes and no one in the secondary to make that stop....or they miss the tackle.
While Muschamp overall was a good DC, he too was susceptable to the gash as well.
I think to some degree these great SEC DC's are continuing to see that the old school ways don't work so well against these high octane O's. See Bama and Ole Miss, Bama has more talent on D than anything south of the NFL, and also proven coaching....but yet give up 43.....Anyone really believe Saban wants to slow down O's because of worry about the players?
Finally, we have 2 years of issues with handling halftime adjustments by the other coaches....as you say, this game shows that it is not all the D's tired from the O not moving the ball.
A D can get itself off the field anytime, if it executes.
Ultimately, in order to win today, big time, you better have a damn good playmaker at QB...this theory of only need someone to manage the O....strictly leads to mediocrity.