Welcome to the HornSports Forum

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.

SignUp Now!

The topic people don't want to get into is getting national coverage

Let me get this straight, UT was "Racist" because we haven't hired a coach because he/she was Black? Wouldn't it make us a "Racist" university if we hired a man/woman because they were Black?

News organizations will try to make "anything" a story (right or wrong) as long as it attracts viewers.

People need to move past the color of a person's skin when trying to make a fair judgment of "said" person.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Northeast media's need to pass judgement and issue their approval on things is so tiresome.

I believe that, according to the DSM-5, this one of the elements of Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

And if it's not, it should be.

 
im ready to see a defense that pushes back and doesn't take anything from the offense, that is what strong will bring
And I'm ready to see our defense knock the crap out of opponents instead of arm tackle them.

 
Barry Switzer Fatherly figure. Ha Ha Right. I am guessing that money under the table had a whole lot more to do with some kids picking OU over Texas.

 
In my experience, some people tend to become overly defensive about their being 'colorblind' because it serves as a shield of sorts against any potential accusations of racism. I've seen it illustrated over and over again on this board and others over the last three days. There was a time growing up in the military when I bought into the concept of our nation being a melting pot and that 'race doesn't matter,' but in my personal and professional experience as an adult, I've come to believe that being 'colorblind' is more dangerous than helpful.
I once met a woman of color who articulated it perfectly, I wish I had had the sense to write it down all those years ago- but in summary, she explained that it's awesome when people want to give her the same degree of respect as they would any white woman, and she understands why people would want to 'see her as a person, not just as a black person,' but to see her without acknowledging the fact that she's black is to ignore a huge part of who she is, or the hundreds of years of cultural history that have contributed to how she identifies herself. Kinda like if we were to see a man wearing a preacher's collar and pretend we don't know he's religious. Maybe one day things will be different, but we're not talking about a thousand generations between then and now, we're talking about a culture only a few generations out from legalized racism (Jim Crow). We still have a lot of work to do.

I hate to get political, because it's never going to end well, but if we don't talk about race or racism or perceptions of reality and how race 'matters,' then we're doomed to allow culturally ingrained biases to perpetuate and evolve into even uglier problems than they already are. I do not think Steve Patterson hired Charlie Strong because he's black, but I do think it's important to celebrate that an enormous barrier has been breached by Texas bringing in a black head coach. And I think it's exciting! Why NOT celebrate it? Whether people want to acknowledge it or not, any fifty-plus year old black man in the United States of America who aspires to an HC position at a major university is going to face a considerable number of challenges that the average white man wouldn't even dream of.

In short, he's a talented coach, it's going to be exciting to see what he does in the next few years, and he's also the first black head coach at the university of Texas. It's okay to talk about it! That's how we learn to empathize with one another's experiences, grow as individuals, and evolve as a society.

Warning: I get like this, all verbose and passionate, about any number of issues. Sorry in advance.
Well stated. I don't think Patterson was race concious in hiring Strong. The perception that race could have been a contributing factor will be washed away when Strong gets the program back on track. Winning will take care of a lot of stigmas. This is as big of a barrier breaker as when Notre Dame named Ty Willingham its coach. How many more blue blood programs have had a black coach in charge? Oklahoma had John Blake and as mentioned Willingham at ND. USC - No, Ohio State - No, Michigan - No, Nebraska - No, Alabama - No.

This is historic for black coaches as much as it's groundbreaking for Texas. Now I do believe Bev Kearney was a head coach on the women's side?

 
What? He's black?








(sarcasm)
Apparently Coach Strong is brown like black. Not brown like Mack. And now Mack ain't got jack! cuz he ain't coming back.

 
Was heavily mentioned on ESPN radio today. They were talking about how this is the first African American head coach in the history of Texas for any major men's sport. That it was long overdue and a good move etc etc.
That's not why he was hired but it's not something that's going unnoticed by the national media. I'm just glad strong is here
The rot within Bellmont is about to be evident to anyone who had any doubts. The media team within Bellmont should have already been starting to get info out on who Charlie Strong is as an individual and as a leader. Until the gets out, people will judge Strong on more superficial metrics. Sadly, we have one of the least competent media teams in sports, either at the pro, college or high school level. Because of this, those who revel in taking shots at Texas will get to set the tone of the discussion. Charlie Strong will have to deal with that sorry aspect of our program. A good, proud, dedicated man will have to deal with a fair amount of negativity because an incompetent left-over head of media relations from the past regime is responsible for introducing Coach Strong on his new stage. For the record, since racial undertones are going to be an element of the discussion, let me come right out and say the incompetent individual is caucasian.

 
Back
Top Bottom