Welcome to the HornSports Forum

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.

SignUp Now!

**Running College Football Updates Thread**

I think the number is around 20 million per team and can increase based on number of subscriptions.

To match the big 12s 31 million, they would need something like 30+ million subscribers - which is equivalent to the number of total apple TV subscribers right now. 
Hard to imagine any school would view this deal as close to competitive with the BIG12 deal.

Sounds like Arizona is a done deal. Be interesting to see what happens next.  I would think the BIG12 makes Oregon and Washington say no, before making any other moves. 

 
Hard to imagine any school would view this deal as close to competitive with the BIG12 deal.

Sounds like Arizona is a done deal. Be interesting to see what happens next.  I would think the BIG12 makes Oregon and Washington say no, before making any other moves. 
Big 12 says they will take one more to pair up with CO. However, it had been talked about taking three more but apparently they didn't want to go that large.

Big10 won't take more. So I'm not sure what happens with Oregon and Washington.

 
I think the number is around 20 million per team and can increase based on number of subscriptions.

To match the big 12s 31 million, they would need something like 30+ million subscribers - which is equivalent to the number of total apple TV subscribers right now. 
There have been some rumors floating that apple is positioning to buy Disney+ which would substantially increase their subscribers. Maybe marvel can design the new pac12 unis.lol

 
That is a lot of teams without dividing up into smaller divisions or "pods". But I'd rather Oregon, Washington, Cal and Stanford have a home somewhere rather than be left orphaned. 
I don't understand why they need to do this. The PAC used to be the Pac 8. Oregon and Washington could dominate the league, with occasional upstarts Wash State, Oregon State, and Stanford.

The money would be lighter so I suppose that's what this is all about. At some point down the road, the large conferences won't work because teams will want a smaller pool and hopefully return to some good regional rivalries. Without regional rivalries, a conference can become rather dull.

 
I don't understand why they need to do this. The PAC used to be the Pac 8. Oregon and Washington could dominate the league, with occasional upstarts Wash State, Oregon State, and Stanford.

The money would be lighter so I suppose that's what this is all about. At some point down the road, the large conferences won't work because teams will want a smaller pool and hopefully return to some good regional rivalries. Without regional rivalries, a conference can become rather dull.
The money is way too light. They’ll be giving up $10M to the big 12. But $30M plus to the big 10 and SEC. That 20M a year is also 17M less than they got this year. No way can they do that. Oregon may get a Nike check to make up the difference but nobody else will. The athletic departments at the PAC 12 schools will go bankrupt. 

 
I don't understand why they need to do this. The PAC used to be the Pac 8. Oregon and Washington could dominate the league, with occasional upstarts Wash State, Oregon State, and Stanford.

The money would be lighter so I suppose that's what this is all about. At some point down the road, the large conferences won't work because teams will want a smaller pool and hopefully return to some good regional rivalries. Without regional rivalries, a conference can become rather dull.
You would think that a 16+ conference would water down the media shares for each team. The TV partners are only going to go so high on their bids.

 
Back
Top Bottom