utisdabomb12
V.I.P.
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2013
- Messages
- 8,338
I saw this discussion on several boards and thought I would chime in.
1-Recruiting is not about just getting highly rated players it's also about getting players that fit your system. IMO Mack often would settle for a player that was higher ranked, but a player that wouldn't fit the system. I always felt Mack needed to put more effort out of state and find more players that were better for the system we were running. Burt is the prime example. Other then maybe Lodge there isn't another viable option in Texas for the type of mold Strong is looking for. If you watch some old Louisville film Strong likes to put tall/lanky type molds on the outside in 2 WR sets. Texas will go after more Burt molds then say Newsome molds IMO. Strong runs a bunch of two WR sets with Burt molds on the outside.
2-The idea that Strong will upset Texas High School coaches is far fetched. If Texas wins they will get recruits in the state. People said the same thing about Saban a few years back. Bottom line, if you win you will get recruits. Regardless, I think people put entirely too much stock in upsetting high school coaches.
3-I still believe that Texas has the best high school football in the country, but I also believe in state recruits are over ranked because of this hype. This is not to say Texas shouldn't go after in state recruits. Rather, Texas shouldn't be afraid to go after recruits out of state just because they are ranked lower. I think the perception that "high school football in the state of Texas is the best" distorts recruiting evaluations/rankings.
4-The other reason I believe recruiting out of state is a good thing is it slows down the process. It forces coaches to make evaluations, look at more players, etc. One of the main reasons Mack would always get these early commits is because he would throw out a bunch of instate offers without really ever going after out of state players. I think Strong's approach is about right. Offer the top tier players you want in state and top tier players you want out of state. Don't throw out offers to second tier in state players until you've exhausted all options out of state on top tier players. This might cause Texas to miss out on a few second tier players in Texas but would minimize situations like Garza and Campbell.
This isn't intended to bash Mack either. I will always be thankful for what Mack brought to the program, but I disagreed with some of the things he did on the recruiting trail.
1-Recruiting is not about just getting highly rated players it's also about getting players that fit your system. IMO Mack often would settle for a player that was higher ranked, but a player that wouldn't fit the system. I always felt Mack needed to put more effort out of state and find more players that were better for the system we were running. Burt is the prime example. Other then maybe Lodge there isn't another viable option in Texas for the type of mold Strong is looking for. If you watch some old Louisville film Strong likes to put tall/lanky type molds on the outside in 2 WR sets. Texas will go after more Burt molds then say Newsome molds IMO. Strong runs a bunch of two WR sets with Burt molds on the outside.
2-The idea that Strong will upset Texas High School coaches is far fetched. If Texas wins they will get recruits in the state. People said the same thing about Saban a few years back. Bottom line, if you win you will get recruits. Regardless, I think people put entirely too much stock in upsetting high school coaches.
3-I still believe that Texas has the best high school football in the country, but I also believe in state recruits are over ranked because of this hype. This is not to say Texas shouldn't go after in state recruits. Rather, Texas shouldn't be afraid to go after recruits out of state just because they are ranked lower. I think the perception that "high school football in the state of Texas is the best" distorts recruiting evaluations/rankings.
4-The other reason I believe recruiting out of state is a good thing is it slows down the process. It forces coaches to make evaluations, look at more players, etc. One of the main reasons Mack would always get these early commits is because he would throw out a bunch of instate offers without really ever going after out of state players. I think Strong's approach is about right. Offer the top tier players you want in state and top tier players you want out of state. Don't throw out offers to second tier in state players until you've exhausted all options out of state on top tier players. This might cause Texas to miss out on a few second tier players in Texas but would minimize situations like Garza and Campbell.
This isn't intended to bash Mack either. I will always be thankful for what Mack brought to the program, but I disagreed with some of the things he did on the recruiting trail.
Last edited by a moderator: