12 hours ago, J.B. TexasEx said:
Okay, let me summarize what Olin wrote. And I used to work with Olin.
His points, translated:
1. Three frosh played in a bowl, so they'll likely be better next year.
2. Two frosh played QB this year. They will be sophomores and will likely play better.
3. 16 warm bodies coming back. The kicker is the only one who merited mention by name. lol
4. Jimbo Fisher is a better game day coach than Sumlin was. Not sure how we know this but we somehow figured no one would question this one. lol This assures aggy no more UCLA's, despite UCLA not being on the schedule anymore. Good news, aggy. Clemson replaced UCLA. lol
5. Fisher can develop quarterbacks, even though his record is no more impressive than Sumlin's was.
6. They have a back who maybe went through a sophomore slump. Fisher will make him good. lol
7. Fisher does well in November. Okay, but you have Auburn and LSU next November. lol
8. They have a new S&C coach. No fading in the 4th.
9. The "presence" of Elko will somehow magically make a difference where Chavis, a more successful DC, could not. Chavis now suddenly only wins when he has a stacked deck. Elko turns straw into gold. lol
10. Secondary will be better and maybe some unnamed incoming freshmen can help. lol smh And this will be because Auburn, LSU and Miss St figure to be weaker next year.
I truly don't know what to say. Someone should print his story out, wad it up and throw it at him.