Sirhornsalot
**The Official Horn Sports Landscaper and Landscap
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2013
- Messages
- 33,286
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.
SignUp Now!That's genius marketing and sales. Math-ing ain't easy.101st East-West Shrine Bowl
Tue Jan 27 at 6:00pm, The Ford Center, Frisco
Anyone going?
View attachment 8898
Tech's pathetic schedule
Tech's pathetic schedule
I thought this video was very interesting, mostly I think his proposals make sense.
Move the portal window out. He gives a good explanation of why this would be beneficial to the players, the coaches and the post season.
One transfer per student, unless a change in coach, or graduation. If they transfer a 2nd time they sit a year, they can get that year of eligibility back only if they graduate.
Another proposal he makes, that sounds interesting, but I suspect may be legally problematic is to make the players invest most of the big money, and only have access to when they graduate or turn 25 , whichever is later.
www.burntorangenation.com
CDC wants playoffs expanded. Implies that's a requirement for marquee matchups after OSU and Michigan.
He isn't specific on how big the expansion should be, or what the selection criteria should be.
He proposes that all teams play in week 0, and no more conference championship games, instead ccg week would be the start of the playoffs.
I'm personally good with eliminating the conference championship games. With the big conferences who makes it to the conference championship game can be a bit convoluted. I also like the proposals to make the ccg week have some additional play in games, but eliminating all of it to start the playoffs certainly helps the scheduling without the top teams playing extra games.
![]()
Chris Del Conte wants to expand the College Football Playoff again
A vision for the postseason that supports the non-conference ambitions of the Longhorns.www.burntorangenation.com
I would like to see them stop at 16. The greed is getting out of hand..
I want to know who the conference champion is. Either find a way for everybody in the conference to play everybody, or have a title game. Conferences need to mean something.
I also would like to see a 16 game playoffs, so not more then 16.
The conference defines 9 of the 12 regular season games. With the 3-6-6 scheduling model you play everybody in the conference at least every other year. That's obviously not nothing.
As far as a conference champion, I appreciate your take, but it's not really settled on the field when you don't have 2 teams with records better then everybody else, instead you get some mostly arbitrary tie breaker, that potentially excludes the team that is the best team entering the playoffs.
The team that separates in the playoffs can reasonably be considered the champion. I guess the conference champion will be more like the national championship, pre BCS. So we use to have smaller conferences with a true champion, but the national championship was based on a poll. Without a CCG it's reversed. Obviously not ideal, but IMHO a reasonable solution.
Then why have a conference at all? Let every team be independent and create their own schedule, as Notre Dame does. Shouldn't matter since conferences really don't matter.
If we went independent would our schedule be as compelling? Would the school be as attractive to recruits? Would the TV money be at least as good? would our access to the playoffs be at least as good?
If the answer to those questions were all yes, then IMHO the SEC wouldn't have any real advantages.
Dude,If we went independent would our schedule be as compelling? Would the school be as attractive to recruits? Would the TV money be at least as good? would our access to the playoffs be at least as good?
If the answer to those questions were all yes, then IMHO the SEC wouldn't have any real advantages.