Welcome to the HornSports Forum

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.

SignUp Now!

Has Casey Thompson reached is peak?

Mac-7

New member
Joined
Oct 5, 2021
Messages
87
Texas now out of the Big 12 race.      Its not time to replace Casey Thompson as the starting QB, but maybe we need to give Hudson Card more 1st team snaps in practice and more game time

I think the offensive line is the weakest part of the team

Texas can move the ball with big plays, but what we need is more sustained drives 

and thats a reflection on the O-line 

 
You can bet that HC is getting plenty of reps in practice, and that he is doing more than carrying a clipboard, But Sark is still trying to win games, Im an HC fan  but now isn't the time to start experimenting, we need to become bowl eligible and position ourselves for having a HUGE recruiting season...lots of playing time left for everyone, lets just hope nobody gets hurt and makes the decision for Sark

 
Game 4 of his first season? lol

I don't get it. Card is unimpressive in the two games he played. He just didn't move the offense. He couldn't avoid the rush. He couldn't or wouldn't improvise.

So we lose to two highly ranked teams and we want the guy who lost his job back?

Are we just tossing the season I guess?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I belive some people are watchingdifferent games. My tv did not show a lot of whate they think they saw.

 
I get the frustrations, but it's not all on Casey. He definitely shares some of the blame, but he's far from the biggest problem. I really wish we could see him with a competent O-line. If this staff fails to bring in 3 solid OL transfers, it's straight up coaching malpractice.

That said, depending on how things go with Baylor and Iowa State, I wouldn't be shocked if Card starts against KU. That would be the most ideal game to start the Freshman. If you put him out there against Baylor and Iowa State, there's more potential for him to get pummeled and hurt his development and confidence more.

 
If you put him out there against Baylor and Iowa State,
We might win.

Casey has been injured for 2 games. Coincidentally we have had an offensive collapse in 2 games. With the season in the trash can, there is nothing to lose trying out other players. I wouldn't count on this staff to change their stripes though. They will likely ride the horse that got them here. 

 
Bud, I'm just saying what I assume the coaching staff will do. Sark and that staff know way more about football then we will ever know in our lifetimes. All we heard about in camp was Casey had an issue throwing INTs and Hudson had an issue taking bad sacks. Both QBs have shown that to be true in their respective playing time. There is a reason they're playing Casey over Hudson. Based on on horrific O-line play, I'm assuming they've decided a porous O-line with a QB that takes bad sacks is a bad combo. I'm assuming they've decided to go with Casey and live with his decision making, good and bad.

Also, those two losses were not on Casey alone, and honestly, I'm going to put very little blame on him for the OU loss. The biggest problem with the offense is terrible O-line play. We played some weaker opponents and they looked better. Then we played more competent defenses with actual pass rushers and they went back to looking like 5 turnstiles. It's hard to do anything on offense when your O-line is plain and simply not very good. Heck, I can't believe we've put up as many points as we have with that O-line.

 
They are not going to make lineup changes to satisfy the fan base. The team NEEDS at least 7 wins this season or they will take a HUGE perception hit, which usually causes more negative recruiting.  

Casey will be here another year after this and benching him at this point could be detrimental. Normally I would say if Texas gets up by two TDs or more, then give backups meaningful game reps but losing multiple games this year after being up three TDs causes one to think they need to be up by 4 TDs before changing game rotation.  At this point, winning games is more important than preparing for next season, IMO

 
Bud, I'm just saying what I assume the coaching staff will do. Sark and that staff know way more about football then we will ever know in our lifetimes. All we heard about in camp was Casey had an issue throwing INTs and Hudson had an issue taking bad sacks. Both QBs have shown that to be true in their respective playing time. There is a reason they're playing Casey over Hudson. Based on on horrific O-line play, I'm assuming they've decided a porous O-line with a QB that takes bad sacks is a bad combo. I'm assuming they've decided to go with Casey and live with his decision making, good and bad.

Also, those two losses were not on Casey alone, and honestly, I'm going to put very little blame on him for the OU loss. The biggest problem with the offense is terrible O-line play. We played some weaker opponents and they looked better. Then we played more competent defenses with actual pass rushers and they went back to looking like 5 turnstiles. It's hard to do anything on offense when your O-line is plain and simply not very good. Heck, I can't believe we've put up as many points as we have with that O-line.
The O-line has been bad forever. Sark knew that when he came here. Trying to constantly run out the clock with Bijan between the tackles is unforgivable. 

 It is absolutely not all on Casey. But he has been playing hurt. When you can't run the ball, it always means because the defense isn't scared of your pass.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The O-line has been bad forever. Sark knew that when he came here. Trying to constantly run out the clock with Bijan between the tackles is unforgivable. 
Dude...it's not like Sark is having Bijan run into the middle of the line three times and punting the ball every drive. You can literally go back and look at the drive summaries and see that's not the case.

Also, if you see Sark's play calling as the problem, then what difference is Card going to make? Serious question.

 
The O-line has been bad forever. Sark knew that when he came here. Trying to constantly run out the clock with Bijan between the tackles is unforgivable. 

 It is absolutely not all on Casey. But he has been playing hurt. When you can't run the ball, it always means because the defense isn't scared of your pass.
agree... Sark is arguably the best offensive mind that Texas has ever had (and, no, GD doesnt even come close) and I'm surprised he has been as predictable using Bijan as he has been.  If you bang your head against the wall and it hurts, do you continue banging your head? I hope not.  If the OL has a hard time opening holes, then you have to get more creative. I dont see hardly any trap or belly (RB dive plays with RB/FB leading blockers) plays nor do I see very many off-tackle plays that isnt a stretch play (which are slow developing). If the OL cant do the job inside, they need to get the playmakers outside. Sark insinuates misdirection plays but rarely implements it. 

Something that REALLY annoyed me during the game was when they ran a veer-type option (double or triple option is still the best play in football; always has been and always will be). It wasnt the play call (I love the option) but the fact that they ran it to the short side of the field and the out of bounds boundary worked against them. That play should have been to the field side so the talent out in space so they can have wider movement options.  When you have a pass-first offensive mentality, something as basic as an option play effectively becomes a trick play... and that's frustrating to watch 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dude...it's not like Sark is having Bijan run into the middle of the line three times and punting the ball every drive. You can literally go back and look at the drive summaries and see that's not the case.

Also, if you see Sark's play calling as the problem, then what difference is Card going to make? Serious question.
 On our last touchdown BR was stuffed twice and luckily got in on the 3rd try by going outside. It has been a trend to fail in the red zone that way. In our last four 3 and outs BR was the offensive plan, until it was 3rd and long.

 It is the play calling more than the players IMO. Card revives the passing game threat that is lacking since Casey's injury.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
 On our last touchdown BR was stuffed twice and luckily got in on the 3rd try by going outside. It has been a trend to fail in the red zone that way. In our last four 3 and outs BR was the offensive plan, until it was 3rd and long.

 It is the play calling more than the players IMO. Card revives the passing game threat that is lacking since Casey's injury.
Ok, if Card is going to revive the passing game threat, is the issue then the play calling or Casey's injury?

 
Ok, if Card is going to revive the passing game threat, is the issue then the play calling or Casey's injury?
Both. Pretty obvious they are working around CT11's injury. The stats since the  OU injury for passing have fallen off the cliff that we all want to drive off of. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top Bottom