Sirhornsalot
**The Official Horn Sports Landscaper and Landscap
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2013
- Messages
- 33,436
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.
SignUp Now!DMAC gets it. Y'all ought to read CTJ's epistle on Surly. He puts it out there thump by thump. The term he uses is "mudhole"
Texas....a lot!
Clemson....a lot less!
Probably because he still thinks that Quinn gives us our best chance to win. I guarantee that is the only metric Sark cares about right now.
Assuming a redshirt freshmen with limited experience playing college ball is the solution is shortsighted. It's a classic example of the backup QB being the most popular player on a team.
Can you copy and paste here or at least post the link? I can't find iit.
I would like to see more of an Arch package in the post-season, could be a dangerous change up and gives teams that much more to prep for.The decision is probably a bit more complicated. Both have advantages and disadvantages. Perhaps Quinn is less likely to throw interception, but is way less of a threat to run. Seems like Arch throws a better deep ball, although I'm not sure we have a big enough sample size to know for sure.
Sark has to try to win, but he also has to consider future recruiting. To not start Quinn in the playoff game would send a message to future recruited that Sark is willing to pull his star QB before he has the opportunity to showcase his talents on the biggest stage.
Sark will start Quinn, and Arch will see the field, how much will depend on how the game goes for Quinn. Hopefully we see Quinn's A game and Arch doesn't play much
SHA....I can't copy and paste from a phone, but DMAC had my back and posted it. I can understand why you couldn't find it. It was cleverly hidden under the post heading.... "Why Texas mudholes Clemson"Can you copy and paste here or at least post the link? I can't find iit.
Might be wrong but think Dabo will have them fired up. Even if he does Texas defense should turn them over and we win. Maybe a mediocre defense will help Quinn. Clemson probably is most talented team in ACC.This isnt the Clemson of old. This game wont be close. Might be our easiest game in a very long time.
Im not impressed with Clemson at all. ACC is as weak as they come. They will have to prove it to me on the field. Maybe they will but I doubt it. They barely beat pitt and SMU. SMU is decent but Clemson stomps no names, eeks out wins over "decent" teams, loses to "good" teams.Might be wrong but think Dabo will have them fired up. Even if he does Texas defense should turn them over and we win. Maybe a mediocre defense will help Quinn. Clemson probably is most talented team in ACC.
You realize last 3 games we are only averaging 17Im not impressed with Clemson at all. ACC is as weak as they come. They will have to prove it to me on the field. Maybe they will but I doubt it. They barely beat pitt and SMU. SMU is decent but Clemson stomps no names, eeks out wins over "decent" teams, loses to "good" teams.
They got smacked by Georgia by 34-3 and lost to in state school S. Carolina. They only beat 2-10 FSU by 16.
All the Clemson talk is name recognition and way overblown. I know im being utterly disrespectful to Clemson but honestly I think they are medicore at best. The majority of SEC teams would beat Clemson.
We will roll this team by 3 scores even if we play badly
I am well aware. Wont matter. Im not scared. You nervous? lolYou realize last 3 games we are only averaging 17