Didn't Patterson say he was not going to set a new precedent for coach's salary? If so, heIs being true to his statement
It's very, very doubtful Patterson would've done something as important as offering Strong without the concurrence of the Rowling-Hicks-Stilwell group who hired him.
Bohls is now confirming what Shuttlesworth has been reporting for some time, that Saban was indeed in-play again, and negotiations with Sexton were active as late as yesterday.
Regardless of how deep the buyer's pockets are, there's a point in every negotiation where savvy businessmen feel that the seller's demands are simply too much for the perceived value of the acquisition. Negotiatons may have reached the point where the BMDs felt Sexton's demands for Saban weren't worth the asking price, and they told Patterson to move on to Strong.