Welcome to the HornSports Forum

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.

SignUp Now!

Can Poona play both DE and DT for

Joined
Dec 29, 2013
Messages
16
Watching his highlights I just love his motor. He might be a little undersized for DE but maybe his long arms could make up for that. Dude was squatting 585 about 5 times on the longhorn network. I would live to see a DL of Cedric Reed 268, Desmond Jackson 305, Malcom Brown 305, and Poona Ford 280-300 . Talk about getting some push and a lot of weight to throw around.

Take a look at Florida Sts defensive line Mario Edwards jr 285, Eddie Goldman 313 both de and Laurence stample 314, Tim Jernigan 294.

 
He runs a sub 4.9 at 280lbs, this guy can play de but I dont see a need there. He is going to be a wrecking ball at DT.

 
Watching his highlights I just love his motor. He might be a little undersized for DE but maybe his long arms could make up for that. Dude was squatting 585 about 5 times on the longhorn network. I would live to see a DL of Cedric Reed 268, Desmond Jackson 305, Malcom Brown 305, and Poona Ford 280-300 . Talk about getting some push and a lot of weight to throw around.


Take a look at Florida Sts defensive line Mario Edwards jr 285, Eddie Goldman 313 both de and Laurence stample 314, Tim Jernigan 294.
I can see Nelson at SDE in a 3 man front. I think Poona's a DT all the way. This is the Big 12. We'll probably be in more 3 man fronts than 4 man. The question is: who can play Buck? Do they move Edmonds?

 
The answer to this may lie in scheme.

Strong was one of the early innovators in the 3-3-5 nickel defense (started when was at USC).

Here is a Grantland piece on it if you really want to dig in http://grantland.com/features/an-excerpt-essential-smart-football-birth-3-3-5-defense/

But I dont know what his plan is now.

The Birth of the 3-3-5 Defense

An excerpt from The Essential Smart Football

 

BY CHRIS BROWN ON JUNE 6, 2012

It was early 2000, and Charlie Strong had a problem. Strong, then in his second season as the defensive coordinator for South Carolina, had gone to Columbia, SC to join head coach Lou Holtz in an attempt to resurrect the school’s moribund program. Unfortunately, instead of resurrecting anything whatsoever, the team finished an abysmal 0-11 in the pair’s first year. Fortunately for Strong, in football, the need for solutions to unique problems often leads to new ideas. In his first year with the Gamecocks, Strong’s defense had little luck defending talented SEC squads solely with traditional defensive alignments. In an effort to combat his superior foes, Strong, whose work at South Carolina and later Florida propelled him to his current role as Louisville’s head coach, went about trying to find a strategy that was novel, adaptable, and, above all else, would actually work. What he came up with was the 3-3-5 or “30 stack†defense — a defense still in vogue around college football, and one that stood as an important predecessor to the NFL’s use of versatile and athletic “hybrid†defenders who have become increasingly valuable despite not being built for traditional roles.

 

The 3-3-5 defense starts with three down linemen, three true linebackers stacked behind those linemen, and five defensive backs. Those five include three in the traditional mold and two hybrid strong safeties/outside linebackers that can patrol the flats, blitz, stop the run or even cover receivers or tight ends in man coverage. This is just one of several ways the 3-3-5 contrasted with more traditional defensive sets, like the 4-3 (four down linemen and three linebackers) or 3-4 (three down linemen and three linebackers). The result was that in 2000, with its revamped defense (along with a new shotgun spread offense to go with it), South Carolina went 8-4 — including 5-3 in the SEC — and defeated Ohio State in the Outback Bowl. Although the 3-3-5 seemed like a wholly new strategy, it didn’t just occur to Charlie Strong out of the blue. The scheme was a natural variant from a defense he coached in another venue under Holtz: Bob Davie’s 3-4 defenses at Notre Dame.

Assuming he sticks with something like this, then you can see the excitement over Freeman.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think with the lack of depth on the DL this year and possibly next the 3-3-5 may end up being a good fit for the talent currently on campus.

I'm wondering if Jinkens can cover well enough to move to the hybrid SS. They could then use Edmund and Santos at LB possibly having Edmund put a hand on the ground to move to a 4-3 at times.

 
The answer to this may lie in scheme.Strong was one of the early innovators in the 3-3-5 nickel defense (started when was at USC).

Here is a Grantland piece on it if you really want to dig in http://grantland.com/features/an-excerpt-essential-smart-football-birth-3-3-5-defense/

But I dont know what his plan is now.

Assuming he sticks with something like this, then you can see the excitement over Freeman.
Too bad Strong won't have Vacarro and Jeffcoat to work with. It was awesome to watch the impact of Jeffcoat moving from DE to LB last year during a drive. Vacarro was capable of playing any of the back 7 positions.

 
I'm hoping Poona plays DT and fullback in goal line situations.

He'd be brutal as a lead back or with the ball in his hands.

 
Back
Top Bottom