Welcome to the HornSports Forum

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.

SignUp Now!

Burton

Bevo11

Veteran
Joined
Nov 9, 2013
Messages
313
Says it is Fisher or Briles unless something strange happens. Says if either interview well and want the job it could "be over in a moment".

Adds there could be an outlier candidate but if it moves beyond those two, Strong is the next choice. Said he isn't sure if we wait to interview Fisher if the Briles interview blows us away. I find that irresponsible.

Got to say, again, the disparity in reporting between sites is HUGE on this story.

 
Yeah, it's crazy how many different things we're hearing.

Regardless, I really hope we don't just hire someone without waiting to hear from others just out of a desire to get it done. Seems extremely irresponsible, especially with something as big as this.

 
So Burton is saying it is Fisher or Briles yet neither have been interviewed? Am I the only one who doesn't see the fallacy in this?

 
I'm not believing a spout of Burton or CB on this thing. I think Bellmont is using those puppets. I'll stick to our guys here and JS. History shows pretty good for our insiders.

 
This is from left field but, what if Patterson is telling certain people at Belmont different coaches? Then looking to see who reports that info, then he knows who the moles are and Gets rid of said people. 2 cents

 
The amount of misinformation and smoke coming from Bellmont is huge. Remember what aidensdad said. 1A has the contract in his hands.

 
IF --

(1) the committee has made it recommendations and concluded its work;

AND

(2) Steve Patterson is alone making this decision

THEN --

the only way that what Burton has said can be true is

IF --

Burton is communicating directly with Patterson

WHICH --

seems unlikely.

 
Aren't then Burton and Orangebloods starting to align somewhat?

It seems as though it's a Fisher, Briles, Strong race at the moment.

Both sites have made a reference of Patterson possibly not waiting around for Fisher.

Inside Texas is still indicating a Saban, Fisher, Briles race with Strong as a distant outlier.

So the sites are starting to add up a little bit

 
There is no way Texas is going to bring Briles in to turn Texas into a Mountain West Conference team. I just don't believe it. Look at the others...Saban, Harbaugh, Jimbo, Strong...these are big boy football coaches. Briles simpy doesn't fit.

 
Under no circumstance do I take Briles over Fisher if he wants the job. If we do in fact pass on Fisher because we don't want to wait until he's done with his game we are making a big mistake. Hope Burton and Chip are wrong on this.

 
IF --
(1) the committee has made it recommendations and concluded its work;

AND

(2) Steve Patterson is alone making this decision

THEN --

the only way that what Burton has said can be true is

IF --

Burton is communicating directly with Patterson

WHICH --

seems unlikely.
Burton communicates with Bill Little FWIW

 
Says it is Fisher or Briles unless something strange happens. Says if either interview well and want the job it could "be over in a moment".
Adds there could be an outlier candidate but if it moves beyond those two, Strong is the next choice. Said he isn't sure if we wait to interview Fisher if the Briles interview blows us away. I find that irresponsible.

Got to say, again, the disparity in reporting between sites is HUGE on this story.[/QUOTE]

I'll say it again. There's a logical reason for this disparity. Each site has their own unique sources and these sources have their own biased agendas. That's why you shouldn't call out the sites themselves or their reporters. They're all simply sharing what their particular source, or sources, has told them. And these sources may be telling the truth as they know it or they may be "stretching" the truth or they may be deliberately giving the sites misleading information. It's just a matter of how it fits their agenda.
 
This is from left field but, what if Patterson is telling certain people at Belmont different coaches? Then looking to see who reports that info, then he knows who the moles are and Gets rid of said people. 2 cents
YOU GOT IT! Burton is Belmont man.

 
Says it is Fisher or Briles unless something strange happens. Says if either interview well and want the job it could "be over in a moment".
Adds there could be an outlier candidate but if it moves beyond those two, Strong is the next choice. Said he isn't sure if we wait to interview Fisher if the Briles interview blows us away. I find that irresponsible.

Got to say, again, the disparity in reporting between sites is HUGE on this story.
That's because McP is talking to a BMD and Burton is talking to Bellmont. Bobby reports the controlled message. McP's message is an opinion of someone that is not measuring his words.

 
That's because McP is talking to a BMD and Burton is talking to Bellmont. Bobby reports the controlled message. McP's message is an opinion of someone that is not measuring his words.
When Bobby was talking to Bellmont his source was Mack Brown.

 
Burton communicates with Bill Little FWIW
In that case, we need to come up with a better version of the saying "Information is worth what you pay for it."

 
This is from left field but, what if Patterson is telling certain people at Belmont different coaches? Then looking to see who reports that info, then he knows who the moles are and Gets rid of said people. 2 cents
I was thinking the same thing....

 
I do not believe one word Burton says. I'll take my chances with the info here.

 
Back
Top Bottom