Beard is done

[TexCoyote]

There was an article in the newspaper this morning about her statement. It was pretty much what we heard. It did say the University was reviewing her statement and that it was an internal investigation and they do not comment on pending investigations. It said she made the 911 call to police. 
It also said and I haven’t seen before: The police affidavit listed several VISIBLE signs of altercation, including bite marks on her arm and abrasions on her face and leg. 
 

So who’s the next coach going to be? It doesn’t matter who started it. You’re the head coach at The University of Texas. You have to leave the premises. 

 

[UTfish]

Just playing devil's advocate here, but I have heard of instances where women tried to use self-inflicted wounds to accuse someone of abuse. Not likely, but it is possible. 

Would be interesting to know exactly where the bite marks are. 

I  agree with SHA, whatever the facts are, that "love at first bite" relationship should end now.

 

[PTA]

The high road is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law, not a court of public opinion. 

in the 21st century, the court of public opinion is the highest court.

 

[PTA]

submitting a quote sometimes acts like it doesn't go through.

 

[Eastexhorn]

Hell hasno fury like a woman scorned. Change scorned to angry and vindictive and it is a more accurate statement.

It is not a nice thing to see even if not involved.  Not sure about leaving the premises from legal stand point

Any if I ada vote would vote to keep Beard.

 

[tejasrulz]

in the 21st century, the court of public opinion is the highest court.

Sad but true

 

[tejasrulz]

Once he gets through this, I would put an end to that relationship if I were him.

My wife said that the night the news broke!

 

[UTfish]

My wife said that the night the news broke!

As Tom Herman would say, wives are really, really smart and winning an argument with them is really, really hard. 

 

[dssl]

Once he gets through this, I would put an end to that relationship if I were him.

We have no information on what makes the relationship work, or not work. From that one incident that seems like sound advice,  but who knows,  maybe he sees her as the love of his life and maybe that night was the first and last time they had that type of fight. 

 

[83Dee]

submitting a quote sometimes acts like it doesn't go through.

This has happened to me.   Sometimes I go back and it did go through… several times.  My conclusion was that it had to do with a weak WiFi signal.  

 

[North Texas Golfer]

As Tom Herman would say, wives are really, really smart and winning an argument with them is really, really hard. 

"Here's all you have to know about men and women: women are crazy, men are stupid. And the main reason women are crazy is that men are stupid."

- George Carlin

 

[Baron]

I personally think that sado masochism is nuts, but I believe it is legal in Texas as long as both parties consent and there's no great bodily harm. 

They could claim that her injuries were a result of S&M, but if that became public knowledge, I don't think he would be retained by UT.     If kept quiet, he might keep his job.

Just a thought. 

As woke as UT is, they should be tolerant of all sexual tendencies. Now I'll just go vomit because of what I just typed.

 

[Baron]

A court finds a person “guilty” or “not guilty”; It doesn’t find someone innocent. If you are found “not guilty” it definitely does not mean you are innocent. We can all think of at least one example. Probably the same one. 

Innocent until proven guilty. Examine the sentence. You are either guilty or innocent by definition of the law.

 

[dssl]

Innocent until proven guilty. Examine the sentence. You are either guilty or innocent by definition of the law.

You are PRESUMED innocent until proven guilty beyond some substantial burden of doubt.  Not guilty is definitely not the same as innocent, it just implies that you are not going to have any criminal consequences. 

 

[Baron]

You are PRESUMED innocent until proven guilty beyond some substantial burden of doubt.  Not guilty is definitely not the same as innocent, it just implies that you are not going to have any criminal consequences. 

I get what you're saying, but I do not believe in gray areas when it comes to the law. If you are found not guilty you are still Presumed innocent.

 

[dssl]

I get what you're saying, but I do not believe in gray areas when it comes to the law. If you are found not guilty you are still Presumed innocent.

Presumed innocent for sure, but that's sometimes different from actually being innocent. 

 

[Wayne]

Innocent until proven guilty. Examine the sentence. You are either guilty or innocent by definition of the law.

No you are not. You were found not guilty because prosecution didn’t find you guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. You could have still committed the crime. A jury doesn’t find you innocent; they find you not guilty. Innocent until proven guilty to my knowledge is not enshrined in the law anywhere.  It is just that the burden of proving guilt is on the state. In some countries the defendant has to prove they are innocent. That is very hard to do. 

 

[Baron]

No you are not. You were found not guilty because prosecution didn’t find you guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. You could have still committed the crime. A jury doesn’t find you innocent; they find you not guilty. Innocent until proven guilty to my knowledge is not enshrined in the law anywhere.  It is just that the burden of proving guilt is on the state. In some countries the defendant has to prove they are innocent. That is very hard to do. 

Again, read the Constitution. Presumed innocent until proven guilty. By law there are only two outcomes.

 

[Wayne]

Again, read the Constitution. Presumed innocent until proven guilty. By law there are only two outcomes.

I’ve read the Constitution presumption of innocence is not guaranteed in it. Court cases give you the presumption of innocence. But a jury finds you “guilty” or “not guilty”. Not guilty does not mean innocent. 

 

[Baron]

I’ve read the Constitution presumption of innocence is not guaranteed in it. Court cases give you the presumption of innocence. But a jury finds you “guilty” or “not guilty”. Not guilty does not mean innocent. 

I'm done. I'm not going to argue the law with a Libtard.