Randolph Duke
THE DUKE
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2012
- Messages
- 2,484
The buyout is a contractual obligation of the coach, personally owed to the university. The next school hiring the coach has nothing to do with the buyout. As a practical matter, the boosters often provide the money the coach needs to satisfy the contractual obligation he owes to the school he is leaving. Otherwise, the coach would have less incentive to leave. If the buyout is paid by anyone on behalf of the coach, the coach has to recognize that as personal income since the IRS considers the forgiveness of a debt as income. In this case, it would be the forgiveness of a debt per se, rather another individual paying the debt, but regardless, the entire amount paid would be income to the coach and that tax liability would also be included in the negotiation.People act like the buyout is a big deal because the BOR wouldn't approve it. Does anybody know whether UT athletics itself actually has to be the one to pay the buyout, or does the money just have to come from somebody on "behalf" of UT athletics? In the latter case, it doesn't seem necessary for the BOR to "approve" the buyout if it's not actually UT's money that would be spent.