Welcome to the HornSports Forum

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.

SignUp Now!

Recruiting

utisdabomb12

V.I.P.
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
8,338
For those melting down over recruiting. 

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2102087-texas-football-predicting-where-the-horns-will-finish-in-2015-recruiting-ranks

"So long as they stay on the current path, the Longhorns will have the top class in the Big 12. Anything more than that depends completely on what they do in the left-hand column. Vahe, Major, Johnson and Omenihu alone will give this class a boost as it climbs the rankings. Along with the rest of the class, they are as committed as it gets this early in the process. As for the safe bets to eventually commit, the 'Horns should be able to land between six and seven based on their ability to provide an early role on the team. But the 'Horns can take as many as 27 recruits this year, so more names are sure to enter the mix. And should Jefferson or Sheffield decide that he looks better in burnt orange than maroon, it wouldn't be out of the question to crack the top five. That's the ceiling with a 10-win season.Realistically, the Longhorns are looking at eight to nine wins. The end will net them a class full of quality players that ends up near the top 10."

 
Texas can do itself a huge favor in the recruiting front by winning this season, plain and simple.
Agreed, but RD has a point when he questioned why UT needs to win to have recruiting success.  Why doesn't aggie?  Will their ballyhooed commits stay firm if they roll over to 4-8 or 5-7?

That's my biggest question.  Not that I'm questioning CFS's player evaluations or strategy.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
nice try, but i predict the meltdowns will continue.
The meltdowns will continue, no doubt. I understand people's concerns because, on paper, we're getting our ass kicked. On the field is where we can turn the tide back in our favor.

 
There is no question in my mind that a poor record by a$m and continued putrid defense, coupled with a good showing from Texas on the filed, will turn the tide in recruiting and cause some decommits in aggyland. They have a huge head-start no doubt, and will likely sign a good class regardless, but the storyline of the season has yet to be written and it will no doubt be a game changer. 

If Texas struggles and a$m does well....then we are pretty screwed.

 
There is no question in my mind that a poor record by a$m and continued putrid defense, coupled with a good showing from Texas on the filed, will turn the tide in recruiting and cause some decommits in aggyland. They have a huge head-start no doubt, and will likely sign a good class regardless, but the storyline of the season has yet to be written and it will no doubt be a game changer. 

If Texas struggles and a$m does well....then we are pretty screwed.
I just don't see a Charlie Strong coached team losing many games.  Can we lose a close one here and there?  Certainly, but I don't see him losing control of the team, and I don't see him losing control of a game.

I remember Darrell Royal coached teams playing more highly ranked Switzer squads and beating the Land Thieves with a goal line stand.  Bless Mack for bringing us a title, but it has been a while since I've seen that type of play in DKR-Texas Memorial Stadium.  (Warning:  If anyone tries to tell me it's due to a different type of offense, get ready, I will not hold back.)

Too many people today over-analyze and over-intellectualize the game.  Hello!  Start with a Bad-A offensive and defensive line, then build from there.  I don't think you can win a title with intellectual midgets or with mercenaries.  I believe that the team needs leadership, passion, a hard-nosed attitude, self-discipline, maturity, good instincts, a good game plan, and a little bit of luck.  They can succeed without some ingredients but not without the hard-nosed attitude, self-discipline, leadership, and passion.

Building a team to compete for a title isn't easy, but Strong knows how to do it.  He's getting it done!

Hook 'em, Charlie!

 
nice try, but i predict the meltdowns will continue.

Sad but true. . . 

I spent 4 days in time out for "questioning OB posters intelligence" so hopefully I can make a disparaging comment here about the lack of critical thinking among many longhorn fans and not be banned. . . .

We're 7 months + from signing day .. . .and trust me. . . .unless aggie starts making some real headway in the division (keep in mind Mizzu already has more football skins on the wall) .. . . the swag copter crap will get old fast. . . .

PS,

One "in the know" guy who's a friend says don't be shocked when Charlie flips one or two of the kids the agroids are crowing about ... . 

He's got some surprises up his sleeve.

 
I just don't see a Charlie Strong coached team losing many games. Can we lose a close one here and there? Certainly, but I don't see him losing control of the team, and I don't see him losing control of a game.

I remember Darrell Royal coached teams playing more highly ranked Switzer squads and beating the Land Thieves with a goal line stand. Bless Mack for bringing us a title, but it has been a while since I've seen that type of play in DKR-Texas Memorial Stadium. (Warning: If anyone tries to tell me it's due to a different type of offense, get ready, I will not hold back.)

Too many people today over-analyze and over-intellectualize the game. Hello! Start with a Bad-A offensive and defensive line, then build from there. I don't think you can win a title with intellectual midgets or with mercenaries. I believe that the team needs leadership, passion, a hard-nosed attitude, self-discipline, maturity, good instincts, a good game plan, and a little bit of luck. They can succeed without some ingredients but not without the hard-nosed attitude, self-discipline, leadership, and passion.

Building a team to compete for a title isn't easy, but Strong knows how to do it. He's getting it done!

Hook 'em, Charlie!
Are you sure you're not actually Tommy Nobis?

Great post and I agree whole heartily!

 
Thanks Shevis.

dobbs, did your wife love the clinic?

My dad talked constantly about his football player when Mom was pregnant.  The day I was born, his former coach gave him...a megaphone!   :-)

It hasn't diminished my enthusiasm at all.  I still love football, and Tommy Nobis was one of Dad's favorite players, but a little before my time.  I do remember sitting in the knothole, though!

Thank you for the compliment!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks Shevis.

dobbs, did your wife love the clinic?

My dad talked constantly about his football player when Mom was pregnant. The day I was born, his former coach gave him...a megaphone! :-)

It hasn't diminished my enthusiasm at all. I still love football, and Tommy Nobis was one of Dad's favorite players, but a little before my time. I do remember sitting in the knothole, though!

Thank you for the compliment!
She had a blast... I asked her about Moorer and she said he worked them in the weight room and was serious. She also said he was friendly. .. but would not smile even when they tried to get him to smile. The first thing she told me was she is going back next year....

 
Agreed, but RD has a point when he questioned why UT needs to win to have recruiting success.  Why doesn't aggie?  Will their ballyhooed commits stay firm if they roll over to 4-8 or 5-7?

That's my biggest question.  Not that I'm questioning CFS's player evaluations or strategy.

It's all relative. If you don't look at it through burnt orange lenses, Aggie is "winning" on the field...

1. Manziel's Bama game

2. The 2012 record

3. Their last 2 years compared with Sherman/Fran era

4. Their last 2 years compared with UT's last 3 years

I agree that Sumlin hasn't won anything of substance (especially considering the talent that's been at his disposal over the last 2 years), but to say that A&M hasn't been winning is a stretch.

CFB is all about perception, and the perception is that the Ag's have been winning. In some respects, it's true. In some, not so much.

 
Here what I keep hearing from Texas fans

1. College Station sucks

2. Aggy lost all their good players

3. Aggy will probably lose at least 6 games this year

4. They have not won anything

5. They finished 4th in their own division

6. The SEC is all hype helped by ESPN

7. Aggy will fail like they always have

I cannot disagree with any of this. So answer me this. How in the hell are they recruiting so well if all this is true? All I can say we better hope the never start winning because if they do we're in deep shit. Also why do we have to win & aggie doesn't to recruit well?

 
Here what I keep hearing from Texas fans

1. College Station sucks

2. Aggy lost all their good players

3. Aggy will probably lose at least 6 games this year

4. They have not won anything

5. They finished 4th in their own division

6. The SEC is all hype helped by ESPN

7. Aggy will fail like they always have

I cannot disagree with any of this. So answer me this. How in the hell are they recruiting so well if all this is true? All I can say we better hope the never start winning because if they do we're in deep shit. Also why do we have to win & aggie doesn't to recruit well?
H55u3rP.gif


 
Here what I keep hearing from Texas fans

1. College Station sucks

2. Aggy lost all their good players

3. Aggy will probably lose at least 6 games this year

4. They have not won anything

5. They finished 4th in their own division

6. The SEC is all hype helped by ESPN

7. Aggy will fail like they always have

I cannot disagree with any of this. So answer me this. How in the hell are they recruiting so well if all this is true? All I can say we better hope the never start winning because if they do we're in deep shit. Also why do we have to win & aggie doesn't to recruit well?
They are recruiting well because of the ridiculous good fortune of everything that has happened since they arrived in the SEC. They are not recruiting well because they are winning a ton of games. They are trading on momentum from Manziel, beating Bama 2 years' ago, 3 first round draft picks, and "Coach Cool." They are also taking advantage of the 4 years of mediocre football from Texas, the ugly divorce from Mack Brown, uncertainty of a new staff and system, and the perception that the Big 12 is a joke. This can all change if the season plays out the way it should. But if it doesn't, we are likely in deep, as you said. 

 
It's all relative. If you don't look at it through burnt orange lenses, Aggie is "winning" on the field...

1. Manziel's Bama game

2. The 2012 record

3. Their last 2 years compared with Sherman/Fran era

4. Their last 2 years compared with UT's last 3 years

I agree that Sumlin hasn't won anything of substance (especially considering the talent that's been at his disposal over the last 2 years), but to say that A&M hasn't been winning is a stretch.

CFB is all about perception, and the perception is that the Ag's have been winning. In some respects, it's true. In some, not so much.
You and MBHORNSFAN are absolutely right - it's all about perception (aided by ESPN and CBS hype). But, to address your points with my patented burnt orange glasses.

  1. A fluke win where everything broke right for the aggies. Bama played an OT night game with LSU the previous week.  I think they were flat and emotionally spent, but aggie won the game. Kudos to them. Overall record versus ranked SEC teams is 1-6, right?
  2. "Special" 2012 team was buoyed by two FCS wins; Sam Houston and South Carolina State. I won't get into how JFF padded his stats against inferior competition. It's well-documented.
  3. No argument.  Aggie underachieved under both coaches.  "Coach Cool" Sumlin did benefit from Sherman's talented players, especially the offensive line. 
  4. Why are we comparing aggie's last 2 years with UT's last 3? 
 
Back
Top Bottom