By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.
SignUp Now!Two more notes from IT...- Ewers was the best of the QBs on the day, including a 60 yard bomb to Worthy.
- Baxter will be a stud, runs hard and continues to impress.
- Offense is coughing the ball up too much right now.
- Hill is the most difficult player to block off of the edge.
- Bledsoe is faster and more athletic than Collins, just not as big.
- Red still in a green jersey due to injury.
- Muhammad was better than he was last week with a forced fumble and a key pass break-up.
Game 1 doesn't tell me much. I expect Texas to win....big. Win game 2 and the conference championship then Ewers is special. Until then, he's right above Case McCoy.Two more notes from IT...
- the source that told them last year that Ewers wouldn't be much better than Card, is now saying he's day in and day out the best QB and expects him to special this year.
- the staff's message to the team this year is they can be special, and not just a conference champion. Expectations are that high.
12 hours ago, TFloss32 said:
But your list doesn’t address the portal. We’ve added serious talent thru the portal. Ewers, Watt, Catalonia, AD Mitchell. A&M seems to lose talent thru the portal.That was obviously a very subjective analysis.
Here's how many top 100 players some of these teams have signed in the 4 year period of 2020 to 2023. Note that attrition and transfers not factored in these numbers.
48 Alabama
41 Georgia
33 Ohio State
32 Texas A$M
24 Clemson
22 LSU
20 USC
19 Texas
Isn't it all subjective?That was obviously a very subjective analysis.
"But your list doesn’t address the portal."But your list doesn’t address the portal. We’ve added serious talent thru the portal. Ewers, Watt, Catalonia, AD Mitchell. A&M seems to lose talent thru the portal.
Of course, it's all subjective. Some are just more subjective than othersIsn't it all subjective?
The recruiting rankings you are using were subjective, and then turned into an objective value that you are then using.
The article is free it appears. The list was actually created by Blake Brockermeyer (with the help of some analyst). He created a top 100 college football players list going into the season and it looks like they attempted to attack this list with some legitimate scouting.
Longhorns on the list:
17. Quinn
28. Kelvin Banks
32. Xavier Worthy
38. Jatavion Sanders
46. AD Mitchell
56. Jaylan Ford
Just for the record, it's a pretty good list. Looks like it's based on both potential and actual results.Isn't it all subjective?
The recruiting rankings you are using were subjective, and then turned into an objective value that you are then using.
The article is free it appears. The list was actually created by Blake Brockermeyer (with the help of some analyst). He created a top 100 college football players list going into the season and it looks like they attempted to attack this list with some legitimate scouting.
Longhorns on the list:
17. Quinn
28. Kelvin Banks
32. Xavier Worthy
38. Jatavion Sanders
46. AD Mitchell
56. Jaylan Ford
For sure in the first half. Let's see if those guys have figured out how to adjust in the second half...