All Things Politics Thread

[Rotty22]

You have your facts and we have the truth 

Which "truth"?  The "no reasonable person truth"?  The "shortbus people truth"?  The "foxitus truth"?  The "oh no, I got caught, what the f do I do truth"?

 

[Rotty22]

Succinct and to the point, but bereft of any meaning. Your next post is more interesting.

No has one meaning....No.

 

[Rotty22]

The worst opportunists weren't rioters. They were the leaders who turned your passion into their gain. Until you realize this and admit it, your posts are pretty much BS for me.

See now you're getting back to the original post.  The leaders, guiliani, trump, powell, pushed their "no reasonable person", "shortbus", "foxitus" narrative and you and others bought into it.  Until you admit it you're credibility is zero.

 

[drgilbert]

Which "truth"?  The "no reasonable person truth"?  The "shortbus people truth"?  The "foxitus truth"?  The "oh no, I got caught, what the f do I do truth"?

The truth that 5 states broke their own voter laws. 

 

[Rotty22]

The truth that 5 states broke their own voter laws. 

There was legislation passed in many states.  Without a specific example, you're just hand waving.

 

[Rotty22]

 

[dillohorn]

4 hours ago, drgilbert said:

Idiots 

We have lost this nation.

 

[drgilbert]

There was legislation passed in many states.  Without a specific example, you're just hand waving.

The legislators never passed the laws. The SOS nor the state Supreme Court have the authority to change voting laws

 

[drgilbert]

This is the same media that certain members think tell them the truth 

 

[drgilbert]

1 hour ago, Rotty22 said:

This is good news. Throw all these type of  criminals in jail 

 

[drgilbert]

16 hours ago, Rotty22 said:

So do you think he was part of the kkk because he was detained (not arrested) at the event?  Then you also said that all the criminals at the BLM riots weren’t actually part of the BLM movement. What is your reasoning for this and how did you come to this conclusion?  

 

[drgilbert]

Will she ever be held accountable 

 

[Sirhornsalot]

There was legislation passed in many states.  Without a specific example, you're just hand waving.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court tacking on mail-in ballots without legislative approval is just one off the top of my head.

 

[Sirhornsalot]

 

[Sirhornsalot]

 

[Sirhornsalot]

 

[Sirhornsalot]

The legislators never passed the laws. The SOS nor the state Supreme Court have the authority to change voting laws

https://www.independentsentinel.com/texas-sues-4-states-that-violated-their-own-election-laws/


Breaking…Texas sues 4 states that violated their own election laws

 

[Sirhornsalot]

https://www.breitbart.com/2020-election/2020/12/17/ken-starr-you-cannot-have-changes-in-election-laws-after-the-fact/


Ken Starr: ‘You Cannot Have Changes in Election Laws After the Fact’

 

[Sirhornsalot]

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/09/activist-courts-several-swing-states-approved-changes-election-law-acting-constitution-will-likely-overturned/


Activist Courts in Several Swing States that Approved Changes to Election Law Were Acting Unlawfully Against the Constitution — Will Likely Be Overturned





MI, PA, WI JUDICIAL VOTE FRAUD UPDATE: Are Democrat House and Senate Candidates Trapped in a No-Win Situation?



 

https://directorblue.blogspot.com/2020/09/mi-pa-wi-judicial-vote-fraud-update-are.html​

 ​

MI, PA, WI JUDICIAL VOTE FRAUD UPDATE: Are Democrat House and Senate Candidates Trapped in a No-Win Situation?
​

As if Democrats weren’t already fomenting enough chaos with their brownshirts -- Antifa, BLM and the like -- the Supreme Courts of several battleground states have decided to pile on. In Pennsylvania, Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin, Democrat activists dressed in black robes have fundamentally rewritten state election laws. Among their various revisions to these crucial laws:

• Mail-in ballots can be received up to seven (7) days after the election and still be counted
  
• These ballots can be missing postmarks and still be counted
  
• The signature on the ballot doesn't even have to match with that of the registered voter
  
• And, as a bonus, they have banned the Green Party from the ballot to prevent erosion of the Biden vote
  

All of these illegal proclamations directly contravene state law and are simply naked, partisan attempts to swing the election.

More importantly, they are in clear violation of the Constitution.





Article I, Section 4


...The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof…



The Judicial branch -- at any level of government -- has no role in deciding the times, places and protocols for Congressional elections. 

Which means that even if the illegal vote harvesting scam promoted by certain state Supreme Courts at the presidential level goes unchallenged, the clear text of the Constitution prevents any other federal office-holder from being counted if it is in violation of state law.

As for the presidential election, the Constitution is equally clear, as Mark Levin has repeatedly pointed out.



Article II, Section 1


...Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector…



Once again, the legislature is wholly responsible for directing the manner of presidential elections.

Rogue Democrat partisans disguised as judges have no role in dictating the times, places and manner of elections for any federal officeholder.

But Article 1, Section 4 of the Constitution clearly dictates that any down-ticket federal elections must conform explicitly to the legislative body’s instructions. Perhaps Democrat activists disguised as judges have helped entrap their own party's Congressional candidates in a web of deception.

 

[Sirhornsalot]

Judge Rules Michigan Secretary Of State Violated State Law With Absentee Ballot Order

A Michigan judge ruled last week that Democratic Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson violated state law when she circumvented the legislature with unilateral orders on absentee voting.

Last year, as Democrats across the country implemented last-minute rule changes ahead of the November election, Benson issued a directive that local clerks count with a presumption of validity.

https://thefederalist.com/2021/03/17/judge-rules-michigan-secretary-of-state-violated-state-law-with-absentee-ballot-order/