Captain Hookem
Rookie
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2013
- Messages
- 355
Good point. Half the battle we see on those videos is getting on arm restraints on someone, which ends up in the struggle with 4 cops sitting on top of someone. Someone who doesn't want handcuffs can make it really difficult to get them on.As far as your question about arresting a violent suspect. It seems to me that restraining the arms and hands first is the only thing that is practical. Otherwise, weapons will be a major concern.
The type of leg restraints I'm referring to are much easier to apply, which then makes putting on the handcuffs easier.
The original thought came from bolos, but I didn't want to say bolos cause I didn't want cheesy super hero coming to mind....now if those Cops had been issued Bolos and were proficient in their use, Mr Brooks would still be alive.
about as constructive as any other solution I have heard.....
Also, I threw my ideas out there to get the convo started. In lieu of better ideas I'm still the leader in the clubhouse.
But to answer seriously, yes with leg restraints Brooks would have still been alive. He would not have been able to struggle, run, or be a part of the situation that led to his shooting.
Last edited by a moderator: