Jump to content

Congratulations, OU, In Your Outrage You Just Violated the Law


Recommended Posts

[R]acist speech is constitutionally protected, just as is expression of other contemptible ideas; and universities may not discipline students based on their speech. That has been the unanimous view of courts that have considered campus speech codes and other campus speech restrictions

 

Further proof that OU sucks!

 

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/415186/congratulations-university-oklahoma-your-outrage-you-just-violated-law-david-french?utm_campaign=trueAnthe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, Duke! I've always wanted that certificate. I know the topic isn't as interesting as animal fornication, but perhaps you can go back to your "It's a Funny World" thread for that?

 

FWIW, an Okie friend of mine sent me a copy of OU's "Student Code". Expulsion is Step 10.

 

http://www.ou.edu/content/dam/studentlife/documents/AllCampusStudentCode.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bottom line, a couple of ou frat d-bags got tossed for dropping n-bombs and getting caught. Racist, yeah. Stupid, hell yeah.

 

I'll sleep fine tonight.

I'll sleep like a baby, too, but it's gonna be interesting and fun to see how this plays out if the frat boys in question have the temerity and gumption to challenge Boren's decision.

 

Oh, and the longer this drags out, the worse it gets for OU. Breaks my heart...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll sleep like a baby, too, but it's gonna be interesting and fun to see how this plays out if the frat boys in question have the temerity and gumption to challenge Boren's decision.

 

Oh, and the longer this drags out, the worse it gets for OU. Breaks my heart...

it ain't the frat boys gumption in question. It's daddy's checkbook and whether he wants to share it with a lawyer to fight a highly publicized racially charged case to keep his kid in school where he'd be a pariah. I'll wager daddy says no unless he's a lawyer of course. Then who knows.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

it ain't the frat boys gumption in question. It's daddy's checkbook and whether he wants to share it with a lawyer to fight a highly publicized racially charged case to keep his kid in school where he'd be a pariah. I'll wager daddy says no unless he's a lawyer of course. Then who knows.

 

Probably not, but maybe an unscrupulous, publicity-seeking lawyer will take on the case pro bono? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not a constitutional expert by any means, but wouldn't hate speech be considered incitement to violence? Schools use criteria to accept kids into their programs, couldn't they say that these students' actions have violated the criteria that allowed them the opportunity to attend the university and therefore make them ineligible to attend? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not a constitutional expert by any means, but wouldn't hate speech be considered incitement to violence? Schools use criteria to accept kids into their programs, couldn't they say that these students' actions have violated the criteria that allowed them the opportunity to attend the university and therefore make them ineligible to attend? 

 

 

Only IF it actually incited violence. But the larger and more prominent obstacle for you there is the free speech amendment. Ugly words are not against the law.

 

OU does have a code of conduct. Expulsion is way down at step #10 in that process but was step #1 in this case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OU sucks in so many ways.

Indeed it does

 

I have mixed feelings about this.  The incident itself is despicable.

 

However the backlash is the expected overreaction from any and everyone.

 

The biggest problem I see is if these students are given due process or not by the university. 

 

 I hate it in America now when we tend to convict and punish out of reflex in the media  instead of due process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed it does

 

I have mixed feelings about this.  The incident itself is despicable.

 

However the backlash is the expected overreaction from any and everyone.

 

The biggest problem I see is if these students are given due process or not by the university. 

 

 I hate it in America now when we tend to convict and punish out of reflex in the media  instead of due process.

 

There's a lot of buzz in the DFW papers about the case this morning. The two SAEs who were leading the song were intoxicated, freshmen pledges from Jesuit Prep and Highland Park, respectively. Apparently, they were taught this song by SAE higher ups and it's not an OU thing - it's a national chapter deal.

 

My question is this, Why are two freshmen SAE pledges leading the party bus in a cheer? Unless, of course, they were ordered to do so by superiors. I'm not Greek, but it's my understanding that pledges keep a low profile unless a ranking member sponsors them or orders them to do something.

 

It will be interesting to see if these kids and their families challenge Boren and OU in court.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not a constitutional expert by any means, but wouldn't hate speech be considered incitement to violence? Schools use criteria to accept kids into their programs, couldn't they say that these students' actions have violated the criteria that allowed them the opportunity to attend the university and therefore make them ineligible to attend? 

 

Slippery slope, IMO.

 

Would a minister, preaching hate towards the USA be considered a violence monger?  Obama's long time minister comes to mind.

 

Actually, I think the 1st amendment is pretty specific about laws being broken - or something like that.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

b7d.jpg

 

Ha, ha!  I can see where you are coming from, but anytime OU or aggy is squirming under public scrutiny, the subject must stay alive.  It is too delicious not to.

 

I'm just hoping, because of this, that Boren is asked to explain why the frat was hammered and why the woman abusers were gladly given schollies.

 

This hypocrisy investigation needs some serious traction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most definitely a slippery slope, but very little to deal with the law isn't. The execution and protection of the 1st Amendment via the courts has a laundry list of flawed or slanted judgments. When you have to have experts interpret what an amendment's application to each individual situation is due to scope, maybe we should start expanding it. It is sad that more often than not constitutionality is deemed more important than common sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a 20 something African American male, I haven't had to deal with too many people threatening to hang me from trees(none actually), of course that could be because I am a pretty physically intimidating guy. I have HEARD family members talk about growing up hearing this kind of thing. It was pretty sobering to watch a video of a chant that was so hateful in nature, being sung with such glee. It was a joyous moment for those guys, and it appeared to be a moment that was dripping in tradition. I don't know if it was within the legal rights of the OU president to kick those kids out of school...and honestly I don't care. 

 

I have seen people defend these guys siting freedom of speech..that's all well and good, but how many freedoms did Americans give up for National Security, I asked that because it appears we as American give up freedoms all the time.... when we feel there is a threat. While singing of the joys of hanging blacks vs the disgrace of a desegregated frat  by some douchey frat guys does not represent some grave national threat, it does make me wonder. How many other frats at schools across the country (The University of Texas) have "traditions" like these, and how many of these frats members go on to work in positions were they are superiors and/or co workers of the minorities they sang gleefully about harming...even if they would never actually raise their hand against anyone..it's hard for me to believe that those feelings, those gleeful moments spent singing about how essentially blacks aren't "good enough" simply vanish after graduation...

 

So yeah OU sucks, but I will give the president of Okalahoma University a big Boomer Sooner for this one...

 

PS OU still sucks.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a 20 something African American male, I haven't had to deal with too many people threatening to hang me from trees(none actually), of course that could be because I am a pretty physically intimidating guy. I have HEARD family members talk about growing up hearing this kind of thing. It was pretty sobering to watch a video of a chant that was so hateful in nature, being sung with such glee. It was a joyous moment for those guys, and it appeared to be a moment that was dripping in tradition. I don't know if it was within the legal rights of the OU president to kick those kids out of school...and honestly I don't care. 

 

I have seen people defend these guys siting freedom of speech..that's all well and good, but how many freedoms did Americans give up for National Security, I asked that because it appears we as American give up freedoms all the time.... when we feel there is a threat. While singing of the joys of hanging blacks vs the disgrace of a desegregated frat  by some douchey frat guys does not represent some grave national threat, it does make me wonder. How many other frats at schools across the country (The University of Texas) have "traditions" like these, and how many of these frats members go on to work in positions were they are superiors and/or co workers of the minorities they sang gleefully about harming...even if they would never actually raise their hand against anyone..it's hard for me to believe that those feelings, those gleeful moments spent singing about how essentially blacks aren't "good enough" simply vanish after graduation...

 

So yeah OU sucks, but I will give the president of Okalahoma University a big Boomer Sooner for this one...

 

PS OU still sucks.. 

 

Well said. 

 

My position is that the action taken towards the racists was appropriate.  However, the vitriolic statement by the university president was a little over the line and inappropriate for such an esteemed position.  A bit more gravitas was warranted in my opinion.  The rest of my position deems the action inexcusably hypocritical.  Hypocritical in light of the fact that star football players, who beat women, were actually rewarded with full scholarships instead of being run out of Norman on a rail.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is pretty clear that this SAE bit is not just relegated to OU. The frat was established in Alabama before the Civil War.

 

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/03/09/1369591/-A-deeper-examination-of-the-sheer-joy-of-Oklahoma-students-chanting-about-hanging-niggers-from-trees

 

This article cites that there were reports of this behavior on the Texas campus a month before the OU campus.

 

 

http://www.theroot.com/articles/news/2015/03/university_of_texas_frat_under_scrutiny_for_racist_and_homophobic_rules.html

 

This site posts about the notorious"FIJI" chapters ridiculous rules for its members.

 

At A&M, there have been issue with FIJI and others. Instances of goat shooting, super wedgies that caused testicle removal, binge drinking resulting in the death of a pledge, parties with racist themes, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish I could figure out how to post a URL. There is an African American professor at OU that has posted a blog piece that is very good. Her name is Maria Dixon Hall, and the post is entitled "A Teachable Moment: How OU Failed Transformation 101." Google it if you wish. She makes some excellent points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish I could figure out how to post a URL. There is an African American professor at OU that has posted a blog piece that is very good. Her name is Maria Dixon Hall, and the post is entitled "A Teachable Moment: How OU Failed Transformation 101." Google it if you wish. She makes some excellent points.

Good call. 

 

Ms. Hall makes some interesting points and has a very Christian, forgiving POV.

 

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/mariadixonhall/2015/03/a-teachable-moment-how-ou-failed-transformation-101/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

Our Affiliation

USATDP_Logo.png

Quick Links

×
×
  • Create New...