Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

Game Day!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

My buddy was at a dinner event last night that Shaka and Charlie attended. Charlie told a couple of stories, but I liked hearing this one the most. A couple weeks ago, Charlie received a call from Sha

I have to say, I'm pretty stoked about the OL talent we have now assembled. We are where we've wanted to be for years now, but were never able to even get halfway there. The talent is not "shovel-read

Per Chip:

"tonight at about 10 pm CT, I get a text from a former player who says, "It's Buechele. QBs at Texas were told tonight. Some of the players aren't happy."

Brown, C. (2016). http://www.scout.com/college/texas/forums/2441-horns-house/14924863-qb-chatter-tonight

Chip  discussed this text message on the Bottom Line radio show this morning...so the cat is definitely out the bag

Link to post
Share on other sites

Per Chip:

 

"tonight at about 10 pm CT, I get a text from a former player who says, "It's Buechele. QBs at Texas were told tonight. Some of the players aren't happy."

 

Brown, C. (2016). http://www.scout.com/college/texas/forums/2441-horns-house/14924863-qb-chatter-tonight

 

Chip  discussed this text message on the Bottom Line radio show this morning...so the cat is definitely out the bag

 

Anwar over at OB is reporting this morning that no QB starter has been named yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anwar over at OB is reporting this morning that no QB starter has been named yet.

 

 

Should be interesting. Except, Anwar cannot say no starter has been named since he's already said it's Swoopes. 

 

So now he's betting against himself? Or did he say he was just kidding? Or has even tried to explain how he's taking two different positions?

 

I'll stick with what Anwar has on the record, for comparison's sake here.

It's Anwar and Swoopes vs Chip and Buechele. 

 

Who will be right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should be interesting. Except, Anwar cannot say no starter has been named since he's already said it's Swoopes. 

 

So now he's betting against himself? Or did he say he was just kidding? Or has even tried to explain how he's taking two different positions?

 

I'll stick with what Anwar has on the record, for comparison's sake here.

It's Anwar and Swoopes vs Chip and Buechele. 

 

Who will be right?

 

For the sake of accuracy, Anwar has never said it was Swoopes. He merely reported that his source told him that Swoopes had outperformed Buechele and that it was really even close. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should be interesting. Except, Anwar cannot say no starter has been named since he's already said it's Swoopes. 

 

So now he's betting against himself? Or did he say he was just kidding? Or has even tried to explain how he's taking two different positions?

 

I'll stick with what Anwar has on the record, for comparison's sake here.

It's Anwar and Swoopes vs Chip and Buechele. 

 

Who will be right?

 

This is 100% incorrect. Anwar reported two weeks that Swoopes leading and playing the best at the time. He never said Swoopes was going to start.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should be interesting. Except, Anwar cannot say no starter has been named since he's already said it's Swoopes. 

 

So now he's betting against himself? Or did he say he was just kidding? Or has even tried to explain how he's taking two different positions?

 

I'll stick with what Anwar has on the record, for comparison's sake here.

It's Anwar and Swoopes vs Chip and Buechele. 

 

Who will be right?

 

Burton is saying that he's reported that Buechele has consistently out performed Swoopes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is 100% incorrect. Anwar reported two weeks that Swoopes leading and playing the best at the time. He never said Swoopes was going to start.

 

 

Thing is, when you say anything is 100% one way or the other – it causes a knee-jerk reaction in those who know your posting. That action is to go back and see what was said then instead of just taking your word for anything. lol

 

POSTED A WEEK AGO

"Coach Strong and the staff have made a decision on who their starter will be. I spoke to a couple sources last night about where things stand. And let’s just say that the incumbent proved harder to defeat than expected but if he doesn’t perform on the field then he won’t sit in the oval office for long."

Props to Anwar Richardson and Orangebloods for having the guts to even suggest this was a possibility early in the camp.

 

 

That was the first post in a thread entitled "It looks like we have our starting QB for the Notre Dame game"

 

Posted that same day, from the Houston Chronicle:  http://www.chron.com/sports/longhorns/article/Longhorns-coach-Charlie-Strong-has-starting-QB-9174882.php with a headline of "Longhorns' coach Charlie Strong has starting QB but will wait to announce"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Week
    Opponent
    W/L
    9/12
    UTEP
    W 59-3
    9/26
    @Texas Tech
    W 63-56 (OT)
    10/3
    TCU
    L 31-33
    10/10
    Oklahoma
    L 45-53 (4OT)
    10/24
    Baylor
    W 27-16
    10/31
    @Oklahoma State
    W 41-34 (OT)
    11/7
    West Virginia
    W 17-13
    11/21
    @Kansas
    11/28
    Iowa State
    12/5
    @Kansas State

Our Affiliation

USATDP_Logo.png

Quick Links

Home
Forums
News
Store

Quick Links

Football
Men's Basketball
Baseball
More Sports

Quick Links

×
×
  • Create New...