Jump to content

Join Our Community

Are you a fan of the Texas Longhorns? Registration is FREE and EASY. Join the discussion!
Sign Up for FREE
Sign in to follow this  
Epictetus

Net Neutrality

Recommended Posts

http://mises.org/library/net-neutrality-scam  The Net Neutrality Scam -- Feb. 26, 2015 -- Mises Institute

 

 

Yet again, the government wants to fix a problem that doesn’t exist. According to the Obama administration and the FCC, it is necessary to regulate internet service providers so that they don’t interfere with people’s access to the web. The claim immediately prompts one to ask: Who is being denied access to the web?

 

In the past twenty years, access to the internet has only become more widespread and service today is far faster for many people — including “ordinary†people — than it was twenty years ago, or even ten years ago. Today, broadband in Europe, where the internet is more tightly regulated, has less reach than it has in the United States.

 

The administration’s plan is rather innocuously called “net neutrality,†but in fact it has nothing at all to do with neutrality and is just a scheme to vastly increase the federal government’s control over the internet.

 

 

Nor are such regulatory regimes even “efficient†in the mainstream use of the term. As economist Douglass North noted, regulatory regimes do not improve efficiency, but serve the interests of those with political power:

So, if populists think net neutrality will somehow give “the people†greater voice in how bandwidth is allocated and ISPs function, they should think again.

 

Institutions are not necessarily or even usually created to be socially efficient; rather they, or at least the formal rules, are created to serve the interests of those with the bargaining power to create new rules.

 

 

In Northwest Austin, after moving back to ATX from Northern California, I had AT&T twisted pair connection that was erratic and just plain awful. My network connection window always showed nearby (neighbors) Road Runners with stronger signals. Finally I switched to TWC Road Runner cable connection. I began at around 5Mb download speed and the usual 500Kb upload.

 

A few years hence, and with no additional charge, here is what I just now show on my iPad that is using the wireless connect in the house using a Netgear Router from BestBuy, and the ARRIS modem from TWC.  Download 40.64 Mbps, Upload 5.45 Mbps. That's wireless.

 

On my iMac with direct cable to the Netgear-ARRIS hookeup: 53.76 Mbps and 5.57 Mbps. (Both tests by OOKLA app and website)

 

With Road Runner I have the combo land line that services one voice line and one fax line.

Surf N Talk basic service, $87.99

Voice mail, $3.95

Home Phone Unlimited, $39.99

Total Pre-tax service: $139.93

Total bill with taxes and fees: $161.58

 

We have a 2-story residence, and with the performance of the separate Netgear router are able to do well throughout the house on other Macs, on my iPad at the kitchen table, and running Netflix on a Visio in my daughter's bedroom...that TV screen is not cabled, it is only running on Wi-Fi.

 

I'm not sure how going to Title II and falling under an executive branch department more in the new direction will improve my service or offer it at a better price. I think I could be anywhere in the Austin municipal area and get the same service. My concern is that things will be worse than better, because often with the government, more regulation equates to 'costs outweighing benefits.' There is the idea that something needs government oversight and regulation in order to be more fair, more correctly done, more 'something' -- all with the belief that an open and free market society can never handle innovation and availability better than can be managed by centralized planning and regulatory oversight.

 

Yet I would have thought if there ever was one thing the whole society more or less "owns" and has responsibility for, and can show it can take innovation and deliver to unbelievable heights... it is the Internet. I know the origin of the concept and technology for it began with the government, but this may be one case where society will have taken an idea and done more with it than any government could ever have done. Showing that liberty does work: a free group of people can interact and innovate remarkably well. Thank you very much!!

 

Now government feels it needs to take the reins of it. You know, to insure things are done correctly. (I'm holding off a stream of consciousness on many trails of thoughts that go with that... think NSA on steroids. Plenty of movie scripts awaiting that).

 

Back on point... in the growing and expanding Interractive portion of South by Southwest, it appears an open society has taken Internet development (products, services) and access far beyond what I ever would have imagined. Will be interesting to see if Net Neutrality is a key topic next month at SXSW.

 

I saw on local Austin news past couple of weeks that the federal government will have a setup at this year's event. Meaning they've rented a large space at some downtown office location (the way that's done these days). My first thought is that it's recruitment for finding talented developers to help with government department innovation, much like there are needs in city organizations to upgrade and innovate data systems. Most government (city, county, state, federal) systems lag behind private industry in that respect. And that was highlighted at recent SXSW events.

 

The federal govenrment may also be here to promote or answer questions on what this FCC ruling will be about, and it comes out today (Feb. 26).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  


Franchise Quest


  • Latest Posts

    • Looking to build off a big win on the road against West Virginia, Texas welcomed Texas Tech to Austin. The Red Raiders were in search of their 6th win and bowl eligibility. The Longhorns never trailed in the game until the 1:47 mark in the 4th quarter, but 2 costly Sam Ehlinger interceptions helped Texas Tech pull out a 27-23 win. The Longhorns opened the game with a trick play, with Lil’ Jordan Humphrey taking a reverse and throwing a 27 yard completion to Sam Ehlinger. A few plays later, Ehlinger found Armanti Foreman on a slant for 27 yard touchdown for the games first score. Ehlinger finished with 239 yards through the air. The Red Raiders responded late in the first quarter when Carter McLane scored on a 1 yard run. After the two teams traded field goals, Kris Boyd intercepted McLane to give Texas good field possession. The Longhorns quickly capitalized and regained the lead on a Daniel Young 9 yard touchdown run. Young finished as the Longhorns leading rusher with 55 yards on 13 carries. McLane was intercepted again late in the second quarter by Devante Davis. Texas was able to march the ball inside the 5, but ultimately had to settle for a Josh Rowland field goal to give the Longhorns a 20-10 halftime lead. Texas Tech opened the second half with the ball and quickly got into Texas territory following an insane catch by T.J Vasher, but the Longhorns defense held and the Red Raiders settled for a 34 yard field goal. Later in the 3rd quarter, Reggie Hemphill Mapps muffed a punt to give Texas Tech great field position again. The offense was unable to take advantage though, and the drive ended in a missed field goal. The Longhorns extended their lead to 23-13 with a Rowland 40 yard field goal at the beginning of the 4th quarter. Texas Tech then opted for a QB switch, and Nic Shimonek took over for McLane. Shimonek led the Red Raiders down the field and tossed a 13 yard touchdown pass to TJ Vasher. Texas had the ball in Texas Tech territory late in the 4th quarter with the opportunity to run out the clock, but San Ehlinger threw his first interception of the game interception and it was returned inside the Texas 15. The Red Raiders scored 2 plays later on a 13 yard pass from Shimonek to Cameron Batson that was ultimately the game winner. Texas had one last chance to take the lead, but another Ehlinger interception ended any comeback hopes. Texas will await the bowl selection in the coming weeks. The Longhorns officially finished the season 6-6 and will look to finish with a bowl win and a winning record for the first time since 2013.
    • (FYI, this is a very long read) Coming off the win against West Virginia this Texas team looked like they were heading towards capping off Tom Herman’s first season with a three game winning streak with what looked like an inevitable win over a struggling Texas Tech team. Confidence only improved when the new broke prior to kickoff that Texas Tech would be rolling with their backup quarterback in the season finale. Then the game happened. Texas was in control of the game for most of the night despite the offense being poor for majority of it. The defense did their job for most of the night, but once Nic Shimonek entered the game he jump started the Tech offense to a degree that resulted in two passing touchdowns, including the dagger that won it. My intro to my actual thoughts will be a page long if I don’t get started, so here we go. ·         That was the worst loss of the season and it’s not even close. I didn’t think it would get much worse than the debacle that Texas opened the season with against Maryland at home. Well the Red Raiders rolled into Austin and Texas promptly said hold my beer. Maryland prior to the massive rash of injuries they went thru actually wasn’t a bad football team. It was easy to see the pieces for the Terps and be hopeful with what they had to work with. In Tech’s case you have a coach who was on the brink of getting fired by his alma mater, he just benched his starting quarterback, and the defense despite being improved is still not very good and had given up their fair share of points and yards this year. They were beaten down coming into this game and even though they were playing for their bowl life they probably would have folded after a few good punches to the mouth. Was Texas able to accomplish that? Nope. After coming right down the field on the first series of the game, the Texas offensive continuously found ways to keep Tech in the game by struggling to make first downs (7 for 22 on 3rd down) and being absolutely horrific in the red zone when they actually made it down there. This offense failed time and time again this year that they were unable to impose their will on a defense when they needed it most and tonight it ended up costing them. Josh Rowland had to kick field goals from 19 and 20 yards out because the offense was unable to finish in the red zone and if they punch just one of those in it’s a completely different ball game. Even after that the game was still there to be won. The bottom line is this game was absolutely winnable and the team proved once again that they have an issue putting teams away. And to be clear this was bigger than the offense not getting done. The defense had several let downs of their own and the biggest ones came down the home stretch once Shimonek was inserted into the game. Good teams finish and the proof is in the pudding for this once again for this 6-6 team. ·         Turnovers cost Texas in more ways than one. I probably could have led off with this considering that turnovers led to Texas’ demise in Austin this evening. The Longhorns gave the ball back to the Red Raiders on four different occasions (two INTs, two fumbles) and the last two were the most crucial. Texas managed to navigated around the fumbles, but the two Ehlinger picks were back breakers and were both were questionable at best decisions from the freshmen. Texas is driving to put the game away in Tech territory and as he scrambles right he throws back across his body in the arms of a defensive back, who ran the ball back deep into Texas territory setting up Tech for the go ahead score. The final one looked like a desperation heave towards to two Texas receivers who didn’t have a shot at making the catch and tried fruitlessly to play defense to no avail. I still think Ehlinger will get better and by no means am I bailing on him this early in his development, but he at least three instances this year where he turned the ball over in crunch time. The fumble at USC, the turnover against Oklahoma State, and the pick tonight against Tech. Depending on how you view the Oklahoma game you could add another one onto his resume. The kid will live and learn, but those were all game deciding turnovers that could have drastically changed the trajectory of Texas entire season. While we are on the topic of turnovers, how many potential turnovers did the Texas defense leave on the field tonight? They managed to pickoff McLane Carter twice, but they also dropped several more that could have changed the outcome. DeShon Elliott in particular dropped one that hit him right in the hands and if he keeps his feet he has a chance at one on the game winning touchdown. ·         Something has to give in the offensive meeting room For me (and just about everyone else) this goes way further than just a one game performance. The Texas offensive went an entire season without really having an identity or any rhyme or reason. At best the offensive performance was frustrating this year and at worst it was absolutely maddening. Tonight was more of the latter than the former. The offensive line only allowed one sack tonight early in the game when the Texas offensive brain trust inexplicably inserted Shane Buechele into the game after initially starting Ehlinger. Buechele completed two passes for six yards and then was never heard from for the rest of the evening, so I am still struggling to grasp the idea of putting Buechele in early on. That’s one of many things I would like explained by the offensive decision makers on this staff. I’ve already touched on the red zone issues the offense has faced all season, but the most puzzling football decision of the night game on the final drive before the half. With only seconds left and no time outs deep in Tech territory, why on Earth are you trying to run the football? Not only was Tech selling out on the run on that play, but Texas was fortunate progress was blown dead because it almost became a turnover. That was a bad football decision in a season that has been full of bad ones. Another instance that stands out in my head was when Texas tried to hurry to the line and run back to back quarterback sweeps on second and third down. The Texas offensive line struggled all night (and year) to impose its will in the run game, so you rush into the same play to the opposite side just to get thrown for a loss and have to punt? This offense scratched and clawed out 116 yards on the ground at a whopping 3.5 yard s per rush against a less than stellar defensive front.  It feels like the guys in the booth have been watching a different group from the rest of us all year long. From the beginning of the season to the end of the season I didn’t see any growth or progress on the offensive side of the ball. Injuries impacted that side of the ball this year, but that still doesn’t explain several that ranges from game planning, play calling, and personnel groupings. I can’t imagine Herman envisioned having to make a staff change this early in his tenure, but there is absolutely no way he can stay with what he has after the performance on the field and up in the box. ·         Finding the optimism will be tough heading into the offseason This team just scratched and clawed its way to yet another 6-win season and even with a bowl game on the horizon this season feels deflating on so many ways. A three game winning streak and a seven win year can be candied up a bit, but ending the season on that kind of note leaves an awfully bitter taste in your mouth even with the bowl eligibility. All of the momentum and you built up last week just went out the window and now you are likely to lose several guys to the NFL via early declarations. Lets say hypothetically Connor Williams, Malik Jefferson, Holton Hill, and DeShon Elliott all declare for the draft next month. Do you feel confident a 6-win team will improve in 2018 after losing those key players considering the issues it faced this year? This season has several parallels to Charlie Strong’s first season in Austin to the point its almost scary. Only thing that is missing is a beat down in a bowl game that sends the team to 6-7 on the year before being victimized by the NFL Draft. ·         Kris Boyd continues to play well Lets end this thing on a positive note. I’ve criticized Kris Boyd as much as anyone this year, so it’s only fair that I acknowledge when he is playing well like he has lately. Last week he locked up a Biletnikoff award finalist in David Sills and this week he was matched up on Dylan Cantrell who on logged two catches for 12 yards this evening. Boyd may not have played at a high level all year like his counterpart Hill did prior to deciding to be a knucklehead, but he is showing with Hill out that he can pick up the slack as the team’s number one corner. That’s very encouraging with the likelihood of Hill declaring for the draft in the coming weeks and gives Todd Orlando a building block to work with in the secondary in 2018. A loss like this takes the wind out of your sails if you are this team and the staff. It looked like the staff was going to be able to hang its hat on progress with a 7-5 year, in which they were competitive week in and out and weren’t embarrassingly blown out like we had become accustomed to. Instead of ending the regular season on a high note, Herman and his staff endured their worst loss to date during his short tenure in Austin, by allowing a mediocre Texas Tech squad mount a comeback in the final moments and embarrass a once program in prime time. I’m not sure where you even begin if you are a coach in that locker room tonight. Now you have to get this team refocused and confident over the next month as you prepare for some third tier bowl game that nobody will probably remember. On to the bowl season.
    • 1st Half The Longhorns took a 20-10 lead into the locker room at halftime but the score wasn’t indicative of promising play from the offense. After starting with a bang on its first offensive possession, Texas had trouble converting in the red zone on several occasions. Todd Orlando’s defense had their share of issues in the first quarter but settled down in the second quarter, giving up just 46 yards of offense in the quarter. *On the first play of the game, LJ Humphrey found Sam Ehlinger for 27 yards. 3 plays later Ehlinger would hit Armanti Foreman for another 27 yards and a touchdown. Looked like the offense was in rhythm and ready to play early on. *Michael Dickson showed again why he is a semifinalist for the Ray Guy Award. Dickson’s 5 punts averaged 52 yards and were all placed deep in Tech territory. Dickson is my MVP of the season for Texas. *Sam Ehlinger started at quarterback and ended the half at quarterback, but Shane Buechele was inserted for the 3rd series of the game. After an opening TD drive and a punt on the next drive, I’m left scratching my head why Ehlinger was replaced for a drive with Buechele? *The Texas running game went for 1-yard in the first quarter and 32 yards in the second quarter. Even with Connor Williams playing again this week the line struggled again to provide holes and protection. 33 yards rushing in a half of play won’t win you many ballgames. Couple this with the fact that Sam Ehlinger couldn’t get settled in the pocket on many throws and was instead forced to roll right and look for receivers that weren’t open. Offensive line woes continued again this half and didn’t provide the necessary time the offense needed to operate efficiently. *While it may be a little late in the season, Josh Rowland went 2-2 in FG’s, something he sorely needed to boost his confidence. The downside is that Texas squandered two opportunities that could have easily been converted into touchdowns. #RedZoneWoes *Big 12 officials take entirely too much time to review the simplest of plays. I’ll leave it at that, but some of the delays are downright excruciating and unnecessary. *Texas Tech had 189 yards of offense in the first quarter. Credit the Texas defense for a nice job of relinquishing just 46 yards in the second quarter. *2- 2Q picks: by Kris Boyd and Davante Davis. Boyd read Carter McClane perfectly and returned his pick 44 yards. Davis struggled in coverage in the first quarter but redeemed himself with a timely interception. *Chris Warren may have moved to Tight End, but he is still a beast. After Davis’ interception, Ehlinger found Warren over the middle for 19 yards to the Texas Tech 1-yard line, punishing defenders in the process. While it is nice to see Warren utilized more in the offense, Texas settled for a Josh Rowland FG on what should have easily been a touchdown. Have to be able to score from a yard out on 4 downs, plain and simple. 2nd Half The Texas offense struggled to put up points in the second half, with Josh Rowland’ field goal serving as the only score for the Longhorns.  Sam Ehlinger’s two interceptions proved to be costly, with the last sealing the Longhorns’ fate tonight. *Michael Dickson yet again.  Dickson’s first punt of the second half was booted and downed at the Texas Tech 1-yard line.  He had a long of 67-yards which was kicked into the end zone. Again, M.V.P. *Toneil Carter fumbled early on in the third quarter.  Sure it happens, but when your running backs aren’t getting consistent carries in real games…. *At the 4:32 mark in the third quarter, Reggie Hemphill-Mapps muffed a punt return which was recovered by Tech at the Texas 32-yard line. Luckily for Hemphill-Mapps and Texas the result was a missed Clayton Hatfield FG. Hands, Reggie, Hands! *Nic Shimonek replaced McLane at quarterback for the Red Raiders early in the 4th quarter and it paid dividends for Kliff Kingsbury. DeShon Elliott was burned on a 52-yard pass early on from Shimonek, who followed it up with a 13 yard TD to TJ Vasher.  Elliott doesn’t give up many big plays, but this was the first of two tonight. Shimonek’s second TD of the night to Cameron Batson as DeShon Elliott slipped in the end zone (with 1:47 left in the game) left the Longhorn offense with the task of scoring a touchdown to come from behind and win.  Texas could only muster up a field goal thus far in the entire second half and a touchdown wasn’t happening. *Sam Ehlinger’s interception at the 2:06 mark which was returned for 55 yards is problematic because it shows that the true freshman’s decision making is still a work-in-progress. As much as Texas fans want him to be the guy right now, he still has a ways to go. *Ehlinger’s second interception of the night sealed the victory for the Red Raiders. Texas had a shot to try and make things happen on their last drive, but Tech’s Douglas Coleman picked the true freshman off. Tech took a knee and became bowl eligible. *The loss hurts for the Longhorns, who are still going bowling, but opens a door for the Red Raiders who became bowl eligible with the win tonight.
    • Page 16 pretty much sums it up for me. Add... one team and coaching staff wanted it more.  A lot more. Their coach was on the hot seat. They looked for a way to win. That 3 and 2 was most telling. Willing to risk a turnover for 2 yards than protect the ball and rely on your Ray Guy punter. Plus, at least a quarterback draw. Too much time in the pocket is a big killer for this offense. Roll-out quick read passes with a dual threat QB is a better game plan. Coaches are paid to (a) know the game better than most (b) optimize plays for the talent they have. Orlando does that well. He makes me dizzy just talking shop. The guy knows his shit. The offense needs that kind of moxie. Ehlinger would make a helluva Tight End.  He is not my QB for the future. That position needs a lot more than what he brings. The new ones on the way are the future. Like the one from Calif. Hope he enrolls for the spring.  
    • Somebody brought up a good point on twitter... how is Mehringer not getting more shit? We have tons of WR talent and NONE of them get open. Even when a qb has some time to throw... none are able to make anything happen consistently. 
×