Jump to content

Join Our Community

Do you bleed Burnt Orange? Come talk about the Longhorns! Registration is FREE and EASY!
Sign Up for FREE
Sign in to follow this  
Jameson McCausland

NCAA passes new transfer and redshirt rules

Recommended Posts

The NCAA passed two new important rules changes onWednesday.

Beginning in October, players will no longer need permission from their coach or school to transfer. 

Via the NCAA

Beginning in October, Division I student-athletes will have the ability to transfer to a different school and receive a scholarship without asking their current school for permission.

The Division I Council adopted a proposal this week that creates a new “notification-of-transfer” model. This new system allows a student to inform his or her current school of a desire to transfer, then requires that school to enter the student’s name into a national transfer database within two business days. Once the student-athlete’s name is in the database, other coaches are free to contact that individual.

The previous transfer rule, which required student-athletes to get permission from their current school to contact another school before they can receive a scholarship after transfer, was intended to discourage coaches from recruiting student-athletes from other Division I schools. The rule change ends the controversial practice in which some coaches or administrators would prevent students from having contact with specific schools. Conferences, however, still can make rules that are more restrictive than the national rule.

In addition to the transfer rule, the NCAA also implemented a new redshirt policy. Beginning in the 2018 season, players can now play up to 4 games and still receive a redshirt year.

VIA the NCAA

Council chair Blake James, athletics director at Miami (Florida), said the rule change benefits student-athletes and coaches alike.

“This change promotes not only fairness for college athletes, but also their health and well-being. Redshirt football student-athletes are more likely to remain engaged with the team, and starters will be less likely to feel pressure to play through injuries,” James said. “Coaches will appreciate the additional flexibility and ability to give younger players an opportunity to participate in limited competition.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't like either rule. It appears the transfer thing could become as big as recruiting itself, except with fewer numbers (one would hope) but with proven names.

Play four games and still redshirt? I can see coaches using that to their advantage and still get the benefit of having the player a fifth year.

Its so different, I think you have to come up with an entirely different term. Playing four games isn't part of a redshirt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The redshirt rule I am ok with. The transfer rule seems a little vague and open. On one hand with the conferences still having control, what will actually be allowed? And on the other hand, will this become open season the minute a kid gets his feelings hurt because he didnt start as a freshman? 

Overall I like the concept and freedom for the players to move around. Just hope there are some controls in place to keep this from becoming a circus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Jameson McCausland said:

The redshirt rule is something Tom Herman lobbied for during the 2017 season. He said players like Kobe Boyce and Montrell Estell would have played towards the end of last season if they could have preserved their redshirt.

lol, well yeah. The same thing can be said for every redshirt there ever was.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see some benefit in the transfer rule when a coach leaves/gets fired from the school. Athletes aren't bound to stay at the school. I always thought it was unfair that a coach can leave for greener pastures but a student-athlete could not. I would have liked to see it fleshed out a little more than. It seems to open ended and I can see a lot of gaming the system.

As for the redshirt change, I'm on the fence with it. I like that a coach can play a kid a couple of games to see what they can do. I can see where it will keep athletes more involved with the team. That is a definite plus. I think it also helps starters if they get hurt early in the season. They won't have to come back too fast. If you get a rash of injuries, you can play redshirted players for up to 4 games before pulling the redshirt. I see that helping with some QBs. The downside is we won't see non scholarship players as much. I kind of liked watching them play in blowouts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, UTfish said:

I'm worried about aggy.  What if they can't keep enough players to field the 11th man, much less the 12th?

I don't think it matters if the aggies can field 11 or not. You're assuming they can count that high. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 12  :huh:

The next aggie up will be the 12th man.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So this means....a school can be figured to be loaded for the next year....if they just had a great,great running back or QB so the scouting staff looks around for the best QB or RB in college ranks and starts recruiting him to have his only possible chance at being on a national championship team.....Think that wont happen? It might even be a Hieseman hopeful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, oldhorn2 said:

So this means....a school can be figured to be loaded for the next year....if they just had a great,great running back or QB so the scouting staff looks around for the best QB or RB in college ranks and starts recruiting him to have his only possible chance at being on a national championship team.....Think that wont happen? It might even be a Hieseman hopeful.

The player would still have to sit out a year (if they are not a grad-transfer). All that the new rule does is prevent a coach/school from restricting where a player is allowed to transfer. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m fine with both rule changes. The redshirt rule prevents kids from having their redshirt years burned when they could really benefit from it and coaches can get creative with how they can get young guys involved while still preserving the redshirt. 

I knew many wouldn’t be fans of the Transfer rule, but I’ve never been okay with schools having the right to setup so many road blocks as far as restrictions go when a kid wants to leave. If a kid doesn’t want to be there then it’s pretty petty in my book to try to control where he goes afterwards. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Daniel Seahorn said:

I’m fine with both rule changes. The redshirt rule prevents kids from having their redshirt years burned when they could really benefit from it and coaches can get creative with how they can get young guys involved while still preserving the redshirt. 

I knew many wouldn’t be fans of the Transfer rule, but I’ve never been okay with schools having the right to setup so many road blocks as far as restrictions go when a kid wants to leave. If a kid doesn’t want to be there then it’s pretty petty in my book to try to control where he goes afterwards. 

 

My problem with the transfer rule is this, how can you keep a coach from recruiting a player signed to another school without a tampering rule in place?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Baron said:

My problem with the transfer rule is this, how can you keep a coach from recruiting a player signed to another school without a tampering rule in place?

I mean if we are being honest, coaches probably tampered before his rule was passed anyway. I don’t know if this rule will make it more blatant, but rules weren’t exactly stopping schools from bending the rules before. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Daniel Seahorn said:

I mean if we are being honest, coaches probably tampered before his rule was passed anyway. I don’t know if this rule will make it more blatant, but rules weren’t exactly stopping schools from bending the rules before. 

If your assumption is correct and we're being honest, this opens the door for even more blatant tampering. Sorry, I don't want to be argumentative, but there needs to be a rule that there can be no contact with employees of another school until the student athlete has given his school a notice of transfer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Baron said:

If your assumption is correct and we're being honest, this opens the door for even more blatant tampering. Sorry, I don't want to be argumentative, but there needs to be a rule that there can be no contact with employees of another school until the student athlete has given his school a notice of transfer.

I agree there needs to be rule, but there will always be people trying to find ways around it. At the end of the day if a kid wants out then he will leave and he won’t really need any motivation from folks elsewhere. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Daniel Seahorn said:

I agree there needs to be rule, but there will always be people trying to find ways around it. At the end of the day if a kid wants out then he will leave and he won’t really need any motivation from folks elsewhere. 

I'm not worried about the kids that want to transfer on their own accord. I'm worried about coaches unduly influencing signed players. If this rule goes into effect as is, you're opening Pandorra's Box.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, Baron said:

I'm not worried about the kids that want to transfer on their own accord. I'm worried about coaches unduly influencing signed players. If this rule goes into effect as is, you're opening Pandorra's Box.

I can maybe see this being an issue if a kid signs and have some buyer’s remorse. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Baron said:

My problem with the transfer rule is this, how can you keep a coach from recruiting a player signed to another school without a tampering rule in place?

Well, the way I read it is that a player would still have to decide on transferring first.  After that, his name goes into a database which is made available to other coaches after a waiting period.  So coaches still can't contact any kid signed with another team.  They technically have to wait until the name pops up in the DB.  I think that's correct.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, texbound said:

Well, the way I read it is that a player would still have to decide on transferring first.  After that, his name goes into a database which is made available to other coaches after a waiting period.  So coaches still can't contact any kid signed with another team.  They technically have to wait until the name pops up in the DB.  I think that's correct.

That's how I understand it also. Hands off until you appear in the DB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  


Franchise Quest


  • Latest Posts

    • After horrible openers, these 5 college football teams are now on the upswing SECOND QUARTER GETTING THEIR ACT TOGETHER There were some notable Week 1 flops, and they were followed by the usual visceral reactions. But a few of the teams that looked really bad in their debuts look a lot better now. The Dash list: Texas (11). What happened in the opener: The Longhorns were taking on a Maryland team presumed to be in disarray after the suspension of head coach D.J. Durkin and an investigation of the program culture. Instead the Terrapins came out inspired and upset Texas, 34-29, in a weather-delayed marathon. What’s happened since then: Texas is 3-0 and looking better with every game. After a struggle to beat Tulsa 28-21, the ‘Horns thumped USC 37-14 and then dominated the second half in a 31-16 upset of TCU. What’s changed: After being a minus-three turnovers against Maryland, Texas is plus-five since (quarterback Sam Ehlinger hasn’t thrown an interception after two in the opener). The Longhorns’ secondary has made significant strides, creating turnovers and making big plays. Is it real: Check back Oct. 6, after Texas plays Oklahoma in Dallas. But signs are promising in Tom Herman’s second season. Michigan (12). What happened in the opener: The Wolverines fell behind Notre Dame immediately and never recovered, losing 24-17. The offense looked every bit as punchless as it did when they finished last season with consecutive losses to Wisconsin, Ohio State and South Carolina. What’s happened since: Michigan is 3-0 against admittedly soft competition, beating teams the Sagarin Ratings place 88th (Western Michigan), 104th (SMU) and 77th (Nebraska). But they have been beatdowns: 46, 25 and 46 points, with the Wolverines scoring 45 or more in each game — last year they never scored more than 36. What’s changed: A beleaguered running game has come to life, producing 790 yards in the three wins. That has reduced the burden on Shea Patterson to carry the offense with his arm — after throwing it 30 times against Notre Dame, he’s averaged 19 attempts per game since. That’s clearly more in Jim Harbaugh’s comfort zone — the last six times his starting quarterback has attempted 30 or more passes, Michigan is 0-6. Is it real: All talk is cheap with the Wolverines until they beat a quality opponent. An eight-game losing streak against ranked teams has to be dealt with before anyone buys into Michigan. That means the three-game stretch against Wisconsin, Michigan State and Penn State Oct. 13-Nov. 3 looms large. That said, this has been Michigan’s most authoritative stretch of football since a bad night in Iowa City in November 2016 changed the trajectory of Harbaugh’s tenure.   Jim Harbaugh’s Michigan Wolverines are looking much better after dropping their opener to Notre Dame. (AP) More Miami (13). What happened in the opener: The Hurricanes were dominated by LSU, trailing 33-3 before scoring a couple of late touchdowns to make it look better. Team Turnover Chain failed to produce a takeaway, quarterback Malik Rosier threw two interceptions, and the Hurricanes were outmuscled in the trenches. What’s happened since: Miami has coasted past Savannah State, Toledo and Florida International — not exactly a gauntlet, but the ‘Canes have taken care of business. Toledo was a trap game on the road, and they took a 21-0 lead and extinguished any comeback hopes in the fourth quarter. Miami also led FIU 31-0 through three quarters before coasting to a 31-17 win. What’s changed: The quarterback. Mark Richt tossed the keys to freshman N’Kosi Perry on the third series against FIU, and he responded by throwing three touchdown passes. Richt hasn’t said whether Perry will start Thursday in the ACC opener against North Carolina, but that seems probable. Beyond that intrigue, Miami’s ability to run the ball — three straight games of more than 200 yards for the first time since 2014 — has made a big difference.   Is it real: In a wide-open ACC Coastal, Miami may be the team to beat. Which doesn’t necessarily translate to challenging Clemson. Texas Tech (14). What happened in the opener: The Red Raiders were boat-raced out of Houston by Mississippi, 47-27. Tech gave up 24 points in the first quarter and 546 yards for the game, continually being gouged for big plays. What’s happened since: Texas Tech is 3-0, lighting up Lamar and Houston for 140 points and then shocking Oklahoma State in Stillwater, 41-17. That ended a nine-game losing streak against the Cowboys, and dramatically altered the perception of Kliff Kingsbury’s team. What’s changed: The Red Raiders are actually balanced offensively, running it 138 times the past three games and throwing it 140. That’s compared to 39 runs and 56 passes against Ole Miss. Outrushing Oklahoma State by 96 yards was a statement — it was the first time in seven games that Tech had out-rushed a Big 12 opponent. Freshman quarterback Alan Bowman is good, but the team is better off if he isn’t throwing it 50-plus times per game. Is it real: If Texas Tech can back up the win in Stillwater by beating undefeated West Virginia Saturday in Lubbock, it may be time to buy in. Washington (15). What happened in the opener: The Huskies lost a red-zone battle of futility against Auburn in Atlanta, 21-16. It was hardly a discouraging loss beyond the fact that Washington had multiple chances to beat a quality opponent and couldn’t secure the game. What’s happened since: Washington is 3-0 and 2-0 in the Pac-12, with wins over a pair of solid teams in Utah and Arizona State. Since the opener, the Huskies have allowed just one touchdown drive after the first quarter. What’s changed: A defense that surrendered 420 yards to Auburn hasn’t given up more than 268 in a game since. Since the Tigers threw the game-winning touchdown pass Sept. 1, Washington has allowed a single TD through the air. Washington also has improved its running production and gotten Myles Gaskin more involved in the offense — he had 17 touches against Auburn, then 33 against Utah and 24 against ASU. Is it real: Real enough to compete in the Pac-12? Yes. Losing to Auburn was never a sign of major trouble. This still isn’t a high-octane offense, but it probably doesn’t need to be to compete for division and league titles.           Five breakout QBs with eyes on Baker Mayfield's NCAA record Yahoo Sports national columnist Pat Forde runs down the list five highly efficient quarterbacks with strong starts to the 2018 season. NEW QBS, BETTER RESULTS Coaches love nothing more than experience at quarterback, but what if that’s overrated? It’s been a spectacular September for some new (or relatively new) QBs on the scene. Five who are either first-year starters or first-year collegians who are threatening to rewrite the history books at their schools: Tua Tagovailoa (16), Alabama. Current pass efficiency rating: 230.47, which leads the nation and would destroy the NCAA record of 198.90, set last year by Baker Mayfield. Alabama’s single-season record: Gary Rutledge, 222.36, in 1973. The caveat there: Rutledge threw just 88 passes while operating Bear Bryant’s wishbone offense and sharing time with Richard Todd. The school record for a minimum 100 attempts is AJ McCarron’s 175.28 in 2012. Tagovailoa may not have the three-year body of work that McCarron did as the ‘Bama starter, but he’s launched a great starting argument to be considered Nick Saban’s best quarterback ever. Dwayne Haskins (17), Ohio State. Current pass efficiency rating: 207.04, which is third nationally and also ahead of Mayfield’s record. Ohio State’s single-season record: J.T. Barrett, 169.8, in 2014 — before Barrett’s passing productivity began to decline. The Buckeyes have wisely shelved Urban Meyer’s long-cherished quarterback run game to focus on Haskins’ passing — he’s run it just 10 times while throwing it 115 times. Haskins is working on a streak of 88 straight passes without an interception. Kyler Murray (18), Oklahoma. Current pass efficiency rating: 203.01, which also is slightly ahead of Mayfield’s national and school record. Mayfield also has the NCAA single-season record for most yards per attempt with a minimum of 700 passes at 11.5, and Murray currently is clocking in at 11.7. (It’s a star-studded record list: behind Mayfield in 2017 is Michael Vick in 1999 at 11.3, Mayfield in 2016 at 11.1, Ty Detmer in 1989 at 11.1, Robert Griffin III at 10.7 in 2011 and James Winston at 10.6 in 2013. All but Vick won the Heisman Trophy.) Trevor Lawrence (19), Clemson. Current pass efficiency rating: 191.83. Clemson single-season record: Deshaun Watson’s 188.6 in 2014, when he played just eight games. Lawrence has been backing up Kelly Bryant, but on Monday Dabo Swinney made the inevitable move to his five-star freshman as the starter against Syracuse on Saturday. Lawrence has thrown nine touchdown passes in just 60 attempts, and both those numbers should rise significantly as he assumes greater command of the Tigers’ offense. Brady White (20), Memphis. Current pass efficiency rating: 189.80. Memphis’ single-season record: The school media guide doesn’t keep track of its all-time leaders in that category, but the record appears to belong to Riley Ferguson last year at 161.18. White transferred in from Arizona State and has raised the bar, at least for the time being, completing 72 percent of his passes with 12 touchdowns and only one interception.   https://sports.yahoo.com/horrible-openers-5-college-football-teams-now-upswing-180928495.html
    • We're after two of his team mates, 4* Marcus Washington being one and some think he's about to commit to the good guys.
    • I got you, just couldn’t resist posting that response.
    • Can someone interpret this please? English preferred.
×